Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Client self rated adult attachment patterns and...
View graph of relations

Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. / Smith, Amie E. M.; Msetfi, Rachel M.; Golding, Laura.
In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, 04.2010, p. 326-337.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Smith AEM, Msetfi RM, Golding L. Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010 Apr;30(3):326-337. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.007

Author

Smith, Amie E. M. ; Msetfi, Rachel M. ; Golding, Laura. / Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. In: Clinical Psychology Review. 2010 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 326-337.

Bibtex

@article{9d6f335658ea4462a134a26c19a65268,
title = "Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review.",
abstract = "Attachment theory has been proposed as a suitable framework within which to understand and explore the therapeutic alliance. This review systematically explores research that has examined the relationship between clients' self reported attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance. Methodological characteristics and study findings are reviewed and discussed with the aim of concluding whether assessing clients' attachment patterns would be beneficial to therapy. In spite of inconsistencies with regards to the measurement and conceptualisation of attachment and the alliance, the evidence suggests that clients who rate themselves as having a more secure attachment pattern are likely to rate the alliance as stronger. The implications of this for therapeutic practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Therapeutic alliance, Attachment",
author = "Smith, {Amie E. M.} and Msetfi, {Rachel M.} and Laura Golding",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "326--337",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Client self rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review.

AU - Smith, Amie E. M.

AU - Msetfi, Rachel M.

AU - Golding, Laura

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Attachment theory has been proposed as a suitable framework within which to understand and explore the therapeutic alliance. This review systematically explores research that has examined the relationship between clients' self reported attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance. Methodological characteristics and study findings are reviewed and discussed with the aim of concluding whether assessing clients' attachment patterns would be beneficial to therapy. In spite of inconsistencies with regards to the measurement and conceptualisation of attachment and the alliance, the evidence suggests that clients who rate themselves as having a more secure attachment pattern are likely to rate the alliance as stronger. The implications of this for therapeutic practice are discussed.

AB - Attachment theory has been proposed as a suitable framework within which to understand and explore the therapeutic alliance. This review systematically explores research that has examined the relationship between clients' self reported attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance. Methodological characteristics and study findings are reviewed and discussed with the aim of concluding whether assessing clients' attachment patterns would be beneficial to therapy. In spite of inconsistencies with regards to the measurement and conceptualisation of attachment and the alliance, the evidence suggests that clients who rate themselves as having a more secure attachment pattern are likely to rate the alliance as stronger. The implications of this for therapeutic practice are discussed.

KW - Therapeutic alliance

KW - Attachment

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 326

EP - 337

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

IS - 3

ER -