Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Literature review › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Literature review › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change and public health policy
T2 - translating the science
AU - Braks, Marieta
AU - van Ginkel, Rijk
AU - Wint, William
AU - Sedda, Luigi
AU - Sprong, Hein
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Public health authorities are required to prepare for future threats and need predictions of the likely impact of climate change on public health risks. They may get overwhelmed by the volume of heterogeneous information in scientific articles and risk relying purely on the public opinion articles which focus mainly on global warming trends, and leave out many other relevant factors. In the current paper, we discuss various scientific approaches investigating climate change and its possible impact on public health and discuss their different roles and functions in unraveling the complexity of the subject. It is not our objective to review the available literature or to make predictions for certain diseases or countries, but rather to evaluate the applicability of scientific research articles on climate change to evidence-based public health decisions. In the context of mosquito borne diseases, we identify common pitfalls to watch out for when assessing scientific research on the impact of climate change on human health. We aim to provide guidance through the plethora of scientific papers and views on the impact of climate change on human health to those new to the subject, as well as to remind public health experts of its multifactorial and multidisciplinary character.
AB - Public health authorities are required to prepare for future threats and need predictions of the likely impact of climate change on public health risks. They may get overwhelmed by the volume of heterogeneous information in scientific articles and risk relying purely on the public opinion articles which focus mainly on global warming trends, and leave out many other relevant factors. In the current paper, we discuss various scientific approaches investigating climate change and its possible impact on public health and discuss their different roles and functions in unraveling the complexity of the subject. It is not our objective to review the available literature or to make predictions for certain diseases or countries, but rather to evaluate the applicability of scientific research articles on climate change to evidence-based public health decisions. In the context of mosquito borne diseases, we identify common pitfalls to watch out for when assessing scientific research on the impact of climate change on human health. We aim to provide guidance through the plethora of scientific papers and views on the impact of climate change on human health to those new to the subject, as well as to remind public health experts of its multifactorial and multidisciplinary character.
KW - climate change
KW - public health
KW - scientific evidence
KW - pitfalls
KW - mosquito borne diseases
KW - VECTOR-BORNE DISEASE
KW - WEST-NILE-VIRUS
KW - INFECTIOUS-DISEASES
KW - GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION
KW - CULEX-PIPIENS
KW - UNITED-STATES
KW - MALARIA
KW - EUROPE
KW - FEVER
KW - EPIDEMIOLOGY
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph110100013
DO - 10.3390/ijerph110100013
M3 - Literature review
VL - 11
SP - 13
EP - 29
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
SN - 1660-4601
IS - 1
ER -