Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of car...

Electronic data

  • fletcher PEC accepted paper may2019

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Patient Education and Counseling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Patient Education and Counseling, 102, 11, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.06

    Accepted author manuscript, 263 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of care’ in mental health and deafness: Sign language interpreters’ perspectives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of care’ in mental health and deafness: Sign language interpreters’ perspectives. / Chatzidamianos, G.; Fletcher, I.; Wedlock, L. et al.
In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 102, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 2010-2015.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chatzidamianos G, Fletcher I, Wedlock L, Lever R. Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of care’ in mental health and deafness: Sign language interpreters’ perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling. 2019 Nov 1;102(11):2010-2015. Epub 2019 May 15. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.016

Author

Bibtex

@article{ddc33ba0457a48459ac0f44151e1fa02,
title = "Clinical communication and the {\textquoteleft}triangle of care{\textquoteright} in mental health and deafness: Sign language interpreters{\textquoteright} perspectives",
abstract = "Objective To explore the processes by which therapeutic alliance develops in mental health consultations with Sign Language interpreters. Method Semi-structured interviews with 7 qualified interpreters were transcribed and analysed with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results Two key themes were generated: (1) Nurturing the triangle of care, where the therapeutic process relied on collaboration, continuity, and trust; and (2) Shared vision and knowledge, in which participants felt misunderstood and unsupported; there was a lack of deaf awareness and clinicians appeared to feel deskilled. Conclusions Interpreters should be viewed as valued members of clinical teams and have access to clinical supervision so that they can be supported in interpreting emotional distressing content. Clinicians can aim to be collaborative with interpreters and improve their knowledge of mental health issues that are relevant to deaf people. Practice Implications An aide-memoire of the role and practicalities of working with SL interpreters should be developed and disseminated to relevant services to support collaborative working with clinicians. A core competence in SL interpreter training is reflexivity. This should be embedded in educational curricula and facilitated through clinical supervision. Funding by commissioning services should be subject to services being deaf aware and interpreters being mental health aware.",
keywords = "Deafness, Interpreters, IPA, Mental health, Qualitative, Therapeutic alliance",
author = "G. Chatzidamianos and I. Fletcher and L. Wedlock and R. Lever",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Patient Education and Counseling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Patient Education and Counseling, 102, 11, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.06",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.016",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "2010--2015",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of care’ in mental health and deafness

T2 - Sign language interpreters’ perspectives

AU - Chatzidamianos, G.

AU - Fletcher, I.

AU - Wedlock, L.

AU - Lever, R.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Patient Education and Counseling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Patient Education and Counseling, 102, 11, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.06

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Objective To explore the processes by which therapeutic alliance develops in mental health consultations with Sign Language interpreters. Method Semi-structured interviews with 7 qualified interpreters were transcribed and analysed with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results Two key themes were generated: (1) Nurturing the triangle of care, where the therapeutic process relied on collaboration, continuity, and trust; and (2) Shared vision and knowledge, in which participants felt misunderstood and unsupported; there was a lack of deaf awareness and clinicians appeared to feel deskilled. Conclusions Interpreters should be viewed as valued members of clinical teams and have access to clinical supervision so that they can be supported in interpreting emotional distressing content. Clinicians can aim to be collaborative with interpreters and improve their knowledge of mental health issues that are relevant to deaf people. Practice Implications An aide-memoire of the role and practicalities of working with SL interpreters should be developed and disseminated to relevant services to support collaborative working with clinicians. A core competence in SL interpreter training is reflexivity. This should be embedded in educational curricula and facilitated through clinical supervision. Funding by commissioning services should be subject to services being deaf aware and interpreters being mental health aware.

AB - Objective To explore the processes by which therapeutic alliance develops in mental health consultations with Sign Language interpreters. Method Semi-structured interviews with 7 qualified interpreters were transcribed and analysed with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results Two key themes were generated: (1) Nurturing the triangle of care, where the therapeutic process relied on collaboration, continuity, and trust; and (2) Shared vision and knowledge, in which participants felt misunderstood and unsupported; there was a lack of deaf awareness and clinicians appeared to feel deskilled. Conclusions Interpreters should be viewed as valued members of clinical teams and have access to clinical supervision so that they can be supported in interpreting emotional distressing content. Clinicians can aim to be collaborative with interpreters and improve their knowledge of mental health issues that are relevant to deaf people. Practice Implications An aide-memoire of the role and practicalities of working with SL interpreters should be developed and disseminated to relevant services to support collaborative working with clinicians. A core competence in SL interpreter training is reflexivity. This should be embedded in educational curricula and facilitated through clinical supervision. Funding by commissioning services should be subject to services being deaf aware and interpreters being mental health aware.

KW - Deafness

KW - Interpreters

KW - IPA

KW - Mental health

KW - Qualitative

KW - Therapeutic alliance

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 102

SP - 2010

EP - 2015

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 11

ER -