Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus front...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. / Slabakova, Roumyana; Kempchinsky, Paula; Rothman, Jason.
In: Second Language Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 31.07.2012, p. 319-343.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Slabakova R, Kempchinsky P, Rothman J. Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. Second Language Research. 2012 Jul 31;28(3):319-343. Epub 2012 Jul 18. doi: 10.1177/0267658312447612

Author

Slabakova, Roumyana ; Kempchinsky, Paula ; Rothman, Jason. / Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish : A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. In: Second Language Research. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 319-343.

Bibtex

@article{53b129655c71404cbf8e014a10a54288,
title = "Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface",
abstract = "This experimental study tests the Interface Hypothesis by looking into processes at the syntax-discourse interface, teasing apart acquisition of syntactic, semantic and discourse knowledge. Adopting L{\'o}pez's (2009) pragmatic features [±a(naphor)] and [±c(ontrast)], which in combination account for the constructions of dislocation and fronting, we tested clitic left dislocation and fronted focus in the comprehension of English native speakers learning Spanish. Furthermore, we tested knowledge of an additional semantic property: the relationship between the discourse anaphor and the antecedent in clitic left dislocation (CLLD). This relationship is free: it can be subset, superset, part/whole. Syntactic knowledge of clitics was a condition for inclusion in the main test. Our findings indicate that all learners are sensitive to the semantic constraints. While the near-native speakers display native-like discourse knowledge, the advanced speakers demonstrated some discourse knowledge, and intermediate learners did not display any discourse knowledge. The findings support as well as challenge the Interface Hypothesis.",
keywords = "clitic left dislocation, clitics, focus fronting, information structure, left dislocation, Spanish, syntax-discourse interface, syntax-semantics interface, topicalization",
author = "Roumyana Slabakova and Paula Kempchinsky and Jason Rothman",
year = "2012",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/0267658312447612",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "319--343",
journal = "Second Language Research",
issn = "0267-6583",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish

T2 - A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface

AU - Slabakova, Roumyana

AU - Kempchinsky, Paula

AU - Rothman, Jason

PY - 2012/7/31

Y1 - 2012/7/31

N2 - This experimental study tests the Interface Hypothesis by looking into processes at the syntax-discourse interface, teasing apart acquisition of syntactic, semantic and discourse knowledge. Adopting López's (2009) pragmatic features [±a(naphor)] and [±c(ontrast)], which in combination account for the constructions of dislocation and fronting, we tested clitic left dislocation and fronted focus in the comprehension of English native speakers learning Spanish. Furthermore, we tested knowledge of an additional semantic property: the relationship between the discourse anaphor and the antecedent in clitic left dislocation (CLLD). This relationship is free: it can be subset, superset, part/whole. Syntactic knowledge of clitics was a condition for inclusion in the main test. Our findings indicate that all learners are sensitive to the semantic constraints. While the near-native speakers display native-like discourse knowledge, the advanced speakers demonstrated some discourse knowledge, and intermediate learners did not display any discourse knowledge. The findings support as well as challenge the Interface Hypothesis.

AB - This experimental study tests the Interface Hypothesis by looking into processes at the syntax-discourse interface, teasing apart acquisition of syntactic, semantic and discourse knowledge. Adopting López's (2009) pragmatic features [±a(naphor)] and [±c(ontrast)], which in combination account for the constructions of dislocation and fronting, we tested clitic left dislocation and fronted focus in the comprehension of English native speakers learning Spanish. Furthermore, we tested knowledge of an additional semantic property: the relationship between the discourse anaphor and the antecedent in clitic left dislocation (CLLD). This relationship is free: it can be subset, superset, part/whole. Syntactic knowledge of clitics was a condition for inclusion in the main test. Our findings indicate that all learners are sensitive to the semantic constraints. While the near-native speakers display native-like discourse knowledge, the advanced speakers demonstrated some discourse knowledge, and intermediate learners did not display any discourse knowledge. The findings support as well as challenge the Interface Hypothesis.

KW - clitic left dislocation

KW - clitics

KW - focus fronting

KW - information structure

KW - left dislocation

KW - Spanish

KW - syntax-discourse interface

KW - syntax-semantics interface

KW - topicalization

U2 - 10.1177/0267658312447612

DO - 10.1177/0267658312447612

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84864023511

VL - 28

SP - 319

EP - 343

JO - Second Language Research

JF - Second Language Research

SN - 0267-6583

IS - 3

ER -