Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme: a triple loss

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme: a triple loss. / Consterdine, Erica; Samuk, Sahizer.
Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers , 2015. p. 1-35.

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Consterdine E, Samuk S. Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme: a triple loss. Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers . 2015, p. 1-35. doi: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/58525/1/wp83.pdf

Author

Consterdine, Erica ; Samuk, Sahizer. / Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme : a triple loss. Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers , 2015. pp. 1-35

Bibtex

@techreport{4f4e0757cb6e4a9bb38a266215937f06,
title = "Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme: a triple loss",
abstract = "Despite temporary migration programmes (TMPs) being heralded as achieving a triple win – whereby the host state, the sending state and the migrants themselves all benefit – the UK government has now terminated all such programmes, including the long- standing Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme (SAWS). At the same time, TMPs have been heavily criticised by both the academic and policy sectors, as they tie workers to employers in rigid ways and lack integration measures. This paper reviews the SAWS scheme, including the policy evolution of the programme and the reasons for the closure. We argue that the government is inflicting a multiple loss scenario, whereby permanent immigration may increase, labour market shortages will be rife, remittances and skills transfers will be lost, and irregular immigration and in turn exploitation of migrant worker rights may be exacerbated. Whilst the policy design of SAWS was far from perfect, we argue that a modified version, targeting agricultural students, should be retained, which could restore the triple-win scenario.",
author = "Erica Consterdine and Sahizer Samuk",
year = "2015",
doi = "http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/58525/1/wp83.pdf",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "1--35",
publisher = "Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers ",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers ",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme

T2 - a triple loss

AU - Consterdine, Erica

AU - Samuk, Sahizer

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Despite temporary migration programmes (TMPs) being heralded as achieving a triple win – whereby the host state, the sending state and the migrants themselves all benefit – the UK government has now terminated all such programmes, including the long- standing Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme (SAWS). At the same time, TMPs have been heavily criticised by both the academic and policy sectors, as they tie workers to employers in rigid ways and lack integration measures. This paper reviews the SAWS scheme, including the policy evolution of the programme and the reasons for the closure. We argue that the government is inflicting a multiple loss scenario, whereby permanent immigration may increase, labour market shortages will be rife, remittances and skills transfers will be lost, and irregular immigration and in turn exploitation of migrant worker rights may be exacerbated. Whilst the policy design of SAWS was far from perfect, we argue that a modified version, targeting agricultural students, should be retained, which could restore the triple-win scenario.

AB - Despite temporary migration programmes (TMPs) being heralded as achieving a triple win – whereby the host state, the sending state and the migrants themselves all benefit – the UK government has now terminated all such programmes, including the long- standing Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme (SAWS). At the same time, TMPs have been heavily criticised by both the academic and policy sectors, as they tie workers to employers in rigid ways and lack integration measures. This paper reviews the SAWS scheme, including the policy evolution of the programme and the reasons for the closure. We argue that the government is inflicting a multiple loss scenario, whereby permanent immigration may increase, labour market shortages will be rife, remittances and skills transfers will be lost, and irregular immigration and in turn exploitation of migrant worker rights may be exacerbated. Whilst the policy design of SAWS was far from perfect, we argue that a modified version, targeting agricultural students, should be retained, which could restore the triple-win scenario.

U2 - http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/58525/1/wp83.pdf

DO - http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/58525/1/wp83.pdf

M3 - Working paper

VL - 83

SP - 1

EP - 35

BT - Closing the seasonal agricultural workers scheme

PB - Sussex Centre for Migration Research Working Papers

ER -