Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Co-designing the environmental land management ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England: The why, who and how of engaging ‘harder to reach’ stakeholders

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England: The why, who and how of engaging ‘harder to reach’ stakeholders. / Tsouvalis, Judith; Hurley, Paul; Lyon, Jessica et al.
In: People and Nature, Vol. 4, No. 3, 30.06.2022, p. 744-757.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tsouvalis J, Hurley P, Lyon J, Hall J, Little R, White V et al. Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England: The why, who and how of engaging ‘harder to reach’ stakeholders. People and Nature. 2022 Jun 30;4(3):744-757. Epub 2022 Mar 29. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10313

Author

Bibtex

@article{bbcaff9f28e9495893291d26d9963e18,
title = "Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England: The why, who and how of engaging {\textquoteleft}harder to reach{\textquoteright} stakeholders",
abstract = "Agriculture around the world needs to become more environmentally sustainable to limit further environmental degradation and impacts of climate change.Many governments try to achieve this through enrolling farmers in agri-environment schemes (AES) that encourage them to undertake conservation activities.Studies show that AES can suffer from low uptake, meaning their environmental objectives remain unattained. To succeed for people and nature, policy-makers are increasingly adopting multi-actor approaches in the {\textquoteleft}co-design{\textquoteright} of AES to make them more attractive and inclusive of a full range of stakeholders, including {\textquoteleft}harder to reach{\textquoteright} farmers.To address why some land managers (principally farmers) may be harder to reach in the context of co-designing England's new Environmental Land Management (ELM) approach, we undertook a quick scoping review of the literature, conducted 23 first-round and 24 s-round interviews with key informants, and held a workshop with 11 practitioners.We outline why farming stakeholders may be harder to reach and how policy-makers can adjust the engagement process to make co-design more inclusive.Based on the results, we make recommendations that could help policy-makers to design better, more inclusive AES that would attract greater uptake and increase their chances of success.",
author = "Judith Tsouvalis and Paul Hurley and Jessica Lyon and Jilly Hall and Ruth Little and Veronica White and Rose, {David Christian}",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.10313",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "744--757",
journal = "People and Nature",
issn = "2575-8314",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England

T2 - The why, who and how of engaging ‘harder to reach’ stakeholders

AU - Tsouvalis, Judith

AU - Hurley, Paul

AU - Lyon, Jessica

AU - Hall, Jilly

AU - Little, Ruth

AU - White, Veronica

AU - Rose, David Christian

PY - 2022/6/30

Y1 - 2022/6/30

N2 - Agriculture around the world needs to become more environmentally sustainable to limit further environmental degradation and impacts of climate change.Many governments try to achieve this through enrolling farmers in agri-environment schemes (AES) that encourage them to undertake conservation activities.Studies show that AES can suffer from low uptake, meaning their environmental objectives remain unattained. To succeed for people and nature, policy-makers are increasingly adopting multi-actor approaches in the ‘co-design’ of AES to make them more attractive and inclusive of a full range of stakeholders, including ‘harder to reach’ farmers.To address why some land managers (principally farmers) may be harder to reach in the context of co-designing England's new Environmental Land Management (ELM) approach, we undertook a quick scoping review of the literature, conducted 23 first-round and 24 s-round interviews with key informants, and held a workshop with 11 practitioners.We outline why farming stakeholders may be harder to reach and how policy-makers can adjust the engagement process to make co-design more inclusive.Based on the results, we make recommendations that could help policy-makers to design better, more inclusive AES that would attract greater uptake and increase their chances of success.

AB - Agriculture around the world needs to become more environmentally sustainable to limit further environmental degradation and impacts of climate change.Many governments try to achieve this through enrolling farmers in agri-environment schemes (AES) that encourage them to undertake conservation activities.Studies show that AES can suffer from low uptake, meaning their environmental objectives remain unattained. To succeed for people and nature, policy-makers are increasingly adopting multi-actor approaches in the ‘co-design’ of AES to make them more attractive and inclusive of a full range of stakeholders, including ‘harder to reach’ farmers.To address why some land managers (principally farmers) may be harder to reach in the context of co-designing England's new Environmental Land Management (ELM) approach, we undertook a quick scoping review of the literature, conducted 23 first-round and 24 s-round interviews with key informants, and held a workshop with 11 practitioners.We outline why farming stakeholders may be harder to reach and how policy-makers can adjust the engagement process to make co-design more inclusive.Based on the results, we make recommendations that could help policy-makers to design better, more inclusive AES that would attract greater uptake and increase their chances of success.

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10313

DO - 10.1002/pan3.10313

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 744

EP - 757

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - 3

ER -