Final published version, 449 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills
T2 - A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies
AU - Onah, Daniel F. O.
AU - Pang, Elaine Ling Ling
AU - Sinclair, Jane Elizabeth
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security.The second group of students participated in a core module of logic andverification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate studentin Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course contentusing their initiative and directing their learning approaches.
AB - Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security.The second group of students participated in a core module of logic andverification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate studentin Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course contentusing their initiative and directing their learning approaches.
KW - Cognitive initiative
KW - Independent learning
KW - Self-regulated learning
KW - MOOC
KW - Conventional learning
KW - Blended-learning
KW - Motivation
KW - Strategies of self-regulation
U2 - 10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w
DO - 10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w
M3 - Journal article
VL - 25
SP - 4365
EP - 4380
JO - Education and Information Technologies
JF - Education and Information Technologies
SN - 1360-2357
IS - 5
ER -