TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care

T2 - towards a programme theory

AU - Wilkinson, J.E.

AU - Rycroft-Malone, J.

AU - Wilkinson, J.

AU - Burton, C.R.

AU - Harvey, G.

AU - McCormack, B.

AU - Graham, I.

AU - Staniszewska, S.

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - ObjectivesIn theory, greater interaction between researchers and practitioners should result in increased potential for implementation. However, we know little about whether this is the case, or what mechanisms might operate to make it happen. This paper reports findings from a study that is identifying and tracking implementation mechanisms, processes, influences and impacts in real time, over time in the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs).MethodsThis is a longitudinal, realist evaluation case study. The development of the conceptual framework and initial hypotheses involved literature reviewing and stakeholder consultation. Primary data were collected through interviews, observations and documents within three CLAHRCs, and analysed thematically against the framework and hypotheses.ResultsThe first round of data collection shows that the mechanisms of collaborative action, relationship building, engagement, motivation, knowledge exchange and learning are important to the processes and outcomes of CLAHRCs' activity, including their capacity for implementation. These mechanisms operated in different contexts such as competing agendas, availability of resources and the CLAHRCs’ brand. Contexts and mechanisms result in different impact, including the CLAHRCs’ approach to implementation, quality of collaboration, commitment and ownership, and degree of sharing and managing knowledge.ConclusionEmerging features of a middle range theory of implementation within collaboration include alignment in organizational structures and cognitive processes, history of partnerships, responsiveness and resilience in rapidly changing contexts. CLARHCs’ potential to mobilize knowledge may be further realized by how they develop insights into their function as collaborative entities.

AB - ObjectivesIn theory, greater interaction between researchers and practitioners should result in increased potential for implementation. However, we know little about whether this is the case, or what mechanisms might operate to make it happen. This paper reports findings from a study that is identifying and tracking implementation mechanisms, processes, influences and impacts in real time, over time in the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs).MethodsThis is a longitudinal, realist evaluation case study. The development of the conceptual framework and initial hypotheses involved literature reviewing and stakeholder consultation. Primary data were collected through interviews, observations and documents within three CLAHRCs, and analysed thematically against the framework and hypotheses.ResultsThe first round of data collection shows that the mechanisms of collaborative action, relationship building, engagement, motivation, knowledge exchange and learning are important to the processes and outcomes of CLAHRCs' activity, including their capacity for implementation. These mechanisms operated in different contexts such as competing agendas, availability of resources and the CLAHRCs’ brand. Contexts and mechanisms result in different impact, including the CLAHRCs’ approach to implementation, quality of collaboration, commitment and ownership, and degree of sharing and managing knowledge.ConclusionEmerging features of a middle range theory of implementation within collaboration include alignment in organizational structures and cognitive processes, history of partnerships, responsiveness and resilience in rapidly changing contexts. CLARHCs’ potential to mobilize knowledge may be further realized by how they develop insights into their function as collaborative entities.

KW - evaluation

KW - implementation

KW - realist

U2 - 10.1177/1355819613498859

DO - 10.1177/1355819613498859

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 13

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 3

ER -