Accepted author manuscript, 426 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Collaborative Inquiry fuelled by Reflexive Learning
T2 - Changing Change
AU - Antonacopoulou, Elena
AU - Bento, Regina
AU - Edward, Gareth
AU - Hawkins, Beverley
AU - Moldjord, Christian
AU - Rigg, Clare
AU - Sklaveniti, Chrysavgi
AU - Soh, Woon Gan
AU - Stokkeland, Christina
PY - 2023/12/31
Y1 - 2023/12/31
N2 - In this paper, we dig deeper into the reflexive learning that fuels collaborative inquiry by examining the unique ways in which changing itself takes place. We draw on two examples of collaborative inquiry, offering autoethnographic insights from our own lived experiences of changing change. These insights are underpinned by reflexive learning which we capture in textual form to show how learning in collaborative inquiry involves ‘impacting with’ rather than ‘impacting on’. Our analysis reveals that reflexivity is not a homogenous or static experience but consists of several dynamically changing entangled ‘dimensions’ of practice. Through dimensions relating to the process, content, and impact of reflexive learning, collaborators can arrive at a ‘stance’ – a fluid, loosely shared basis for action that enables organizational practices to be reconfigured or preserve key principles.
AB - In this paper, we dig deeper into the reflexive learning that fuels collaborative inquiry by examining the unique ways in which changing itself takes place. We draw on two examples of collaborative inquiry, offering autoethnographic insights from our own lived experiences of changing change. These insights are underpinned by reflexive learning which we capture in textual form to show how learning in collaborative inquiry involves ‘impacting with’ rather than ‘impacting on’. Our analysis reveals that reflexivity is not a homogenous or static experience but consists of several dynamically changing entangled ‘dimensions’ of practice. Through dimensions relating to the process, content, and impact of reflexive learning, collaborators can arrive at a ‘stance’ – a fluid, loosely shared basis for action that enables organizational practices to be reconfigured or preserve key principles.
U2 - 10.1177/00218863231183217
DO - 10.1177/00218863231183217
M3 - Journal article
VL - 59
SP - 740
EP - 777
JO - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
JF - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
SN - 0021-8863
IS - 4
ER -