Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction. / Costley , Jamie; Fanguy II, Mik.
In: Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 69, No. 2, 30.04.2021, p. 655-671.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Costley , J & Fanguy II, M 2021, 'Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction', Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2

APA

Costley , J., & Fanguy II, M. (2021). Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2

Vancouver

Costley J, Fanguy II M. Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2021 Apr 30;69(2):655-671. Epub 2021 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2

Author

Costley , Jamie ; Fanguy II, Mik. / Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load : The interplay of completeness and interaction. In: Educational Technology Research and Development. 2021 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 655-671.

Bibtex

@article{7d0390b4f0144bcabc4ddd1927b85653,
title = "Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction",
abstract = "Studies showing improved learning performances for students who take notes collaboratively have speculated that sharing this task among group members may reduce the extraneous cognitive burden placed on each member. Therefore, a study (n=171) was conducted in the context of a flipped scientific writing course to examine the effects of collaborative note-taking on student{\textquoteright}s levels of cognitive load. Students in the course were divided into two groups, with members of the treatment group being directed to take collaborative notes in a shared online document and members of the control group receiving no such instructions. The study also measured the level of collaboration the collaborative note-takers engaged in, as well as the level of completeness of the notes that they produced. The results showed that, firstly, the treatment group reported higher levels of both germane and extraneous cognitive load compared to those of the control group, meaning that collaborative note-takers experienced higher levels of understanding of course content as well as increased confusion. Secondly, the level of collaboration was positively and significantly correlated with levels of germane load (understanding), but not with extraneous load (confusion). Thirdly, no correlation was found between completeness of notes and cognitive load. Accordingly, the authors suggest that collaborative note-taking is worthwhile, as the gains to students{\textquoteright} understanding of course content outweigh the disadvantages of increased confusion. ",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Note-taking, Collaboration, Flipped instruction, Online video lectures",
author = "Jamie Costley and {Fanguy II}, Mik",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "655--671",
journal = "Educational Technology Research and Development",
issn = "1042-1629",
publisher = "Springer Boston",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load

T2 - The interplay of completeness and interaction

AU - Costley , Jamie

AU - Fanguy II, Mik

PY - 2021/4/30

Y1 - 2021/4/30

N2 - Studies showing improved learning performances for students who take notes collaboratively have speculated that sharing this task among group members may reduce the extraneous cognitive burden placed on each member. Therefore, a study (n=171) was conducted in the context of a flipped scientific writing course to examine the effects of collaborative note-taking on student’s levels of cognitive load. Students in the course were divided into two groups, with members of the treatment group being directed to take collaborative notes in a shared online document and members of the control group receiving no such instructions. The study also measured the level of collaboration the collaborative note-takers engaged in, as well as the level of completeness of the notes that they produced. The results showed that, firstly, the treatment group reported higher levels of both germane and extraneous cognitive load compared to those of the control group, meaning that collaborative note-takers experienced higher levels of understanding of course content as well as increased confusion. Secondly, the level of collaboration was positively and significantly correlated with levels of germane load (understanding), but not with extraneous load (confusion). Thirdly, no correlation was found between completeness of notes and cognitive load. Accordingly, the authors suggest that collaborative note-taking is worthwhile, as the gains to students’ understanding of course content outweigh the disadvantages of increased confusion.

AB - Studies showing improved learning performances for students who take notes collaboratively have speculated that sharing this task among group members may reduce the extraneous cognitive burden placed on each member. Therefore, a study (n=171) was conducted in the context of a flipped scientific writing course to examine the effects of collaborative note-taking on student’s levels of cognitive load. Students in the course were divided into two groups, with members of the treatment group being directed to take collaborative notes in a shared online document and members of the control group receiving no such instructions. The study also measured the level of collaboration the collaborative note-takers engaged in, as well as the level of completeness of the notes that they produced. The results showed that, firstly, the treatment group reported higher levels of both germane and extraneous cognitive load compared to those of the control group, meaning that collaborative note-takers experienced higher levels of understanding of course content as well as increased confusion. Secondly, the level of collaboration was positively and significantly correlated with levels of germane load (understanding), but not with extraneous load (confusion). Thirdly, no correlation was found between completeness of notes and cognitive load. Accordingly, the authors suggest that collaborative note-taking is worthwhile, as the gains to students’ understanding of course content outweigh the disadvantages of increased confusion.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Note-taking

KW - Collaboration

KW - Flipped instruction

KW - Online video lectures

U2 - 10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2

DO - 10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 69

SP - 655

EP - 671

JO - Educational Technology Research and Development

JF - Educational Technology Research and Development

SN - 1042-1629

IS - 2

ER -