Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Collective control, social cohesion and health ...

Electronic data

  • JPH_Manuscript_Revised_with_tables_14.10.20

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version V J McGowan, N Akhter, E Halliday, J Popay, A Kasim, C Bambra, Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the communities in control study in England, Journal of Public Health, 2022; 44: 378-386 available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/1/73

    Accepted author manuscript, 371 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England. / McGowan, V.J.; Akhter, N; Halliday, Emma et al.
In: Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), Vol. 44, No. 2, 30.06.2022, p. 378-386.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McGowan VJ, Akhter N, Halliday E, Popay J, Kasmin A, Bambra C. Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom). 2022 Jun 30;44(2):378-386. Epub 2021 Jan 11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa227

Author

McGowan, V.J. ; Akhter, N ; Halliday, Emma et al. / Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being : baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England. In: Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom). 2022 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 378-386.

Bibtex

@article{5d32569dde18480abe45e76f4deabfd1,
title = "Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England",
abstract = "Background: Area-based initiatives (ABIs) are receiving renewed interest as part of {\textquoteleft}place-based public health{\textquoteright} approaches to reducing health inequalities. Purpose: Examine associations between collective control, social-cohesion and health amongst residents involved in the Big Local ABI. Methods: Survey data on general health, mental wellbeing, perceptions of individual and collective control, and social-cohesion was obtained in 2016 for 1600 residents involved in the 150 Big Local ABI areas in England, 862 responded - a response rate of >50%. Adjusted mean differences and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using random effect linear and generalised estimating equation models. Subgroup analysis by gender and educational level was conducted.Results: Mental wellbeing was positively associated with collective control (Mean Difference 3.06 units, 1.23-4.90) and some measures of social cohesion ({\textquoteleft}people in the area are willing to help each other{\textquoteright} [Mean Difference 1.77 units, 0.75-2.78]). General health was positively associated with other measures of social cohesion (area-belonging [Odds Ratio 4.25, 2.26-7.97]). Conclusion: Collective control and some aspects of social cohesion were positively associated with better mental wellbeing and self-rated health amongst residents involved with Big Local. These positive associations were often greater amongst women and participants with a lower education. Increasing the collective control residents have in ABIs could improve the health effects of ABIs. ",
keywords = "ABI, deprivation, health inequality, social determinants, socio-economic status, place",
author = "V.J. McGowan and N Akhter and Emma Halliday and Jennie Popay and A Kasmin and Clare Bambra",
note = "This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version V J McGowan, N Akhter, E Halliday, J Popay, A Kasim, C Bambra, Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the communities in control study in England, Journal of Public Health, 2022; 44: 378-386 is available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/1/73",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdaa227",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "378--386",
journal = "Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)",
issn = "1741-3842",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being

T2 - baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England

AU - McGowan, V.J.

AU - Akhter, N

AU - Halliday, Emma

AU - Popay, Jennie

AU - Kasmin, A

AU - Bambra, Clare

N1 - This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version V J McGowan, N Akhter, E Halliday, J Popay, A Kasim, C Bambra, Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the communities in control study in England, Journal of Public Health, 2022; 44: 378-386 is available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/1/73

PY - 2022/6/30

Y1 - 2022/6/30

N2 - Background: Area-based initiatives (ABIs) are receiving renewed interest as part of ‘place-based public health’ approaches to reducing health inequalities. Purpose: Examine associations between collective control, social-cohesion and health amongst residents involved in the Big Local ABI. Methods: Survey data on general health, mental wellbeing, perceptions of individual and collective control, and social-cohesion was obtained in 2016 for 1600 residents involved in the 150 Big Local ABI areas in England, 862 responded - a response rate of >50%. Adjusted mean differences and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using random effect linear and generalised estimating equation models. Subgroup analysis by gender and educational level was conducted.Results: Mental wellbeing was positively associated with collective control (Mean Difference 3.06 units, 1.23-4.90) and some measures of social cohesion (‘people in the area are willing to help each other’ [Mean Difference 1.77 units, 0.75-2.78]). General health was positively associated with other measures of social cohesion (area-belonging [Odds Ratio 4.25, 2.26-7.97]). Conclusion: Collective control and some aspects of social cohesion were positively associated with better mental wellbeing and self-rated health amongst residents involved with Big Local. These positive associations were often greater amongst women and participants with a lower education. Increasing the collective control residents have in ABIs could improve the health effects of ABIs.

AB - Background: Area-based initiatives (ABIs) are receiving renewed interest as part of ‘place-based public health’ approaches to reducing health inequalities. Purpose: Examine associations between collective control, social-cohesion and health amongst residents involved in the Big Local ABI. Methods: Survey data on general health, mental wellbeing, perceptions of individual and collective control, and social-cohesion was obtained in 2016 for 1600 residents involved in the 150 Big Local ABI areas in England, 862 responded - a response rate of >50%. Adjusted mean differences and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using random effect linear and generalised estimating equation models. Subgroup analysis by gender and educational level was conducted.Results: Mental wellbeing was positively associated with collective control (Mean Difference 3.06 units, 1.23-4.90) and some measures of social cohesion (‘people in the area are willing to help each other’ [Mean Difference 1.77 units, 0.75-2.78]). General health was positively associated with other measures of social cohesion (area-belonging [Odds Ratio 4.25, 2.26-7.97]). Conclusion: Collective control and some aspects of social cohesion were positively associated with better mental wellbeing and self-rated health amongst residents involved with Big Local. These positive associations were often greater amongst women and participants with a lower education. Increasing the collective control residents have in ABIs could improve the health effects of ABIs.

KW - ABI

KW - deprivation

KW - health inequality

KW - social determinants

KW - socio-economic status

KW - place

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa227

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa227

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 378

EP - 386

JO - Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

JF - Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 2

ER -