Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous int...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology. / Qin, Dongxu; Bai, Anying; Xue, Peng et al.
In: BMC Cancer, Vol. 23, No. 1, 187, 23.02.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{403de48b36e641dfb80bd7668ac1d47a,
title = "Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology",
abstract = "Background: Colposcopy is an important tool in diagnosing cervical cancer, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) issued the latest version of the guidelines in 2011. This study aims to systematically assess the accuracy of colposcopy in predicting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) / high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) under the 2011 IFCPC terminology. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for studies about the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. Data were independently extracted by two authors and an overall diagnostic performance index was calculated under two colposcopic thresholds. Results: Totally, fifteen articles with 22,764 participants in compliance with the criteria were included in meta-analysis. When colposcopy was used to detect LSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.95) and 0.51 (0.43–0.59), respectively. When colposcopy was used to detect HSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (0.58–0.76) and 0.93 (0.88–0.96), respectively. Conclusion: In accordance with the 2011 IFCPC terminology, the accuracy of colposcopy has improved in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. Colposcopy is now more sensitive with LSIL+ taken as the cut-off value and is more specific to HSIL+. These findings suggest we are avoiding under- or overdiagnosis both of which impact on patients{\textquoteright} well-being.",
keywords = "Research, Colposcopy, Diagnosis, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Dongxu Qin and Anying Bai and Peng Xue and Samuel Seery and Jiaxu Wang and Mendez, {Maria Jose Gonzalez} and Qing Li and Yu Jiang and Youlin Qiao",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1186/s12885-023-10648-1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "BMC Cancer",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology

AU - Qin, Dongxu

AU - Bai, Anying

AU - Xue, Peng

AU - Seery, Samuel

AU - Wang, Jiaxu

AU - Mendez, Maria Jose Gonzalez

AU - Li, Qing

AU - Jiang, Yu

AU - Qiao, Youlin

PY - 2023/2/23

Y1 - 2023/2/23

N2 - Background: Colposcopy is an important tool in diagnosing cervical cancer, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) issued the latest version of the guidelines in 2011. This study aims to systematically assess the accuracy of colposcopy in predicting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) / high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) under the 2011 IFCPC terminology. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for studies about the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. Data were independently extracted by two authors and an overall diagnostic performance index was calculated under two colposcopic thresholds. Results: Totally, fifteen articles with 22,764 participants in compliance with the criteria were included in meta-analysis. When colposcopy was used to detect LSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.95) and 0.51 (0.43–0.59), respectively. When colposcopy was used to detect HSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (0.58–0.76) and 0.93 (0.88–0.96), respectively. Conclusion: In accordance with the 2011 IFCPC terminology, the accuracy of colposcopy has improved in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. Colposcopy is now more sensitive with LSIL+ taken as the cut-off value and is more specific to HSIL+. These findings suggest we are avoiding under- or overdiagnosis both of which impact on patients’ well-being.

AB - Background: Colposcopy is an important tool in diagnosing cervical cancer, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) issued the latest version of the guidelines in 2011. This study aims to systematically assess the accuracy of colposcopy in predicting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) / high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) under the 2011 IFCPC terminology. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for studies about the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. Data were independently extracted by two authors and an overall diagnostic performance index was calculated under two colposcopic thresholds. Results: Totally, fifteen articles with 22,764 participants in compliance with the criteria were included in meta-analysis. When colposcopy was used to detect LSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.95) and 0.51 (0.43–0.59), respectively. When colposcopy was used to detect HSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (0.58–0.76) and 0.93 (0.88–0.96), respectively. Conclusion: In accordance with the 2011 IFCPC terminology, the accuracy of colposcopy has improved in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. Colposcopy is now more sensitive with LSIL+ taken as the cut-off value and is more specific to HSIL+. These findings suggest we are avoiding under- or overdiagnosis both of which impact on patients’ well-being.

KW - Research

KW - Colposcopy

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

U2 - 10.1186/s12885-023-10648-1

DO - 10.1186/s12885-023-10648-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

SN - 1471-2407

IS - 1

M1 - 187

ER -