Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 59 (3), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of Humanistic Psychology page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jhp on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 383 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Commentary on Jonathan Raskin’s ‘What might an alternative to the DSM suitable for psychotherapists look like?’
AU - Cooper, Rachel Valerie
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 59 (3), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of Humanistic Psychology page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jhp on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Many mental health practitioners find it necessary to use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) for insurance purposes but are unhappy with its basic assumptions. This raises the question—Would it be possible to devise a new classification system that (1) could be used for insurance purposes and (2) would be based on alternative principles? In the main, this commentary is pessimistic. Through considering the history of attempts to devise alternatives to the DSM, I will argue that it would be extremely difficult to develop an alternative to the DSM that could be used to fund psychotherapy via health care insurance in the United States.
AB - Many mental health practitioners find it necessary to use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) for insurance purposes but are unhappy with its basic assumptions. This raises the question—Would it be possible to devise a new classification system that (1) could be used for insurance purposes and (2) would be based on alternative principles? In the main, this commentary is pessimistic. Through considering the history of attempts to devise alternatives to the DSM, I will argue that it would be extremely difficult to develop an alternative to the DSM that could be used to fund psychotherapy via health care insurance in the United States.
KW - DSM-5
KW - Psychotherapy
KW - disganosis
U2 - 10.1177/0022167818793751
DO - 10.1177/0022167818793751
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 59
SP - 376
EP - 384
JO - Journal of Humanistic Psychology
JF - Journal of Humanistic Psychology
SN - 1552-650X
IS - 3
ER -