Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks. / He, Xuan; Hussain Shah, Syed Bilal; Wei, Bo et al.
In: Complexity, Vol. 2021, 6691880, 01.09.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

He X, Hussain Shah SB, Wei B, Liu Z. Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks. Complexity. 2021 Sept 1;2021:6691880. Epub 2021 Feb 2. doi: 10.1155/2021/6691880

Author

He, Xuan ; Hussain Shah, Syed Bilal ; Wei, Bo et al. / Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks. In: Complexity. 2021 ; Vol. 2021.

Bibtex

@article{e53057350fef46e391b559d7116395c7,
title = "Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks",
abstract = "The approach of the complex network has well described seismic complex systems. In this paper, this is the first time three classical network construction methods for seismicity are compared. By using the same dataset from the Southern California Seismic Network, three networks are constructed. They all present the scale-free, small-world properties, a strength-degree correlation, and an assortative mixing feature. However, they show some differences in the hierarchical clustering feature. On observing the evolution results, three measures show a similar correlation with seismicity dynamics, but one measure shows a different result. These results show that different network construction methods will present some similarities and differences in network properties. This situation needs to be considered, especially when discussing a predictive indicator of seismicity.",
author = "Xuan He and {Hussain Shah}, {Syed Bilal} and Bo Wei and Zheng Liu",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2021/6691880",
language = "English",
volume = "2021",
journal = "Complexity",
issn = "1076-2787",
publisher = "Hindawi Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison and Analysis of Network Construction Methods for Seismicity Based on Complex Networks

AU - He, Xuan

AU - Hussain Shah, Syed Bilal

AU - Wei, Bo

AU - Liu, Zheng

PY - 2021/9/1

Y1 - 2021/9/1

N2 - The approach of the complex network has well described seismic complex systems. In this paper, this is the first time three classical network construction methods for seismicity are compared. By using the same dataset from the Southern California Seismic Network, three networks are constructed. They all present the scale-free, small-world properties, a strength-degree correlation, and an assortative mixing feature. However, they show some differences in the hierarchical clustering feature. On observing the evolution results, three measures show a similar correlation with seismicity dynamics, but one measure shows a different result. These results show that different network construction methods will present some similarities and differences in network properties. This situation needs to be considered, especially when discussing a predictive indicator of seismicity.

AB - The approach of the complex network has well described seismic complex systems. In this paper, this is the first time three classical network construction methods for seismicity are compared. By using the same dataset from the Southern California Seismic Network, three networks are constructed. They all present the scale-free, small-world properties, a strength-degree correlation, and an assortative mixing feature. However, they show some differences in the hierarchical clustering feature. On observing the evolution results, three measures show a similar correlation with seismicity dynamics, but one measure shows a different result. These results show that different network construction methods will present some similarities and differences in network properties. This situation needs to be considered, especially when discussing a predictive indicator of seismicity.

U2 - 10.1155/2021/6691880

DO - 10.1155/2021/6691880

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2021

JO - Complexity

JF - Complexity

SN - 1076-2787

M1 - 6691880

ER -