Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluores...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils. / Paveley, Catherine F.; Davies, Brian E.; Jones, Kevin.
In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 107-116.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Paveley CF, Davies BE, Jones K. Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 1988 Jan 1;19(1):107-116. doi: 10.1080/00103628809367923

Author

Paveley, Catherine F. ; Davies, Brian E. ; Jones, Kevin. / Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils. In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 1988 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 107-116.

Bibtex

@article{18b40e2a0d594ebb9ad6264b99df6dea,
title = "Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils",
abstract = "The routine determiniation of lead and zinc in soil by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) of a hot aqua regia extract and by X-ray fluorescence (XRFS) spectrometry of the powdered soil is described and the results obtained by the two techniques compared. A strong positive correlation was found between the concentration for both elements obtained by the two methods. Generally, assaying by XRFS gave higher soil lead and zinc concentrations than that determined by AAS assay of an acid extract. However, extraction by aqua regia followed by AAS provides a satisfactory method for determining the lead and zinc concentrations in soil as a routine procedure.",
keywords = "acid digestion, heavy metals",
author = "Paveley, {Catherine F.} and Davies, {Brian E.} and Kevin Jones",
year = "1988",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00103628809367923",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "107--116",
journal = "Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis",
issn = "0010-3624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of results obtained by x-ray fluorescence of the total soil and the atomic absorption spectrometry assay of an acid digest in the routine determination of lead and zinc in soils

AU - Paveley, Catherine F.

AU - Davies, Brian E.

AU - Jones, Kevin

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The routine determiniation of lead and zinc in soil by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) of a hot aqua regia extract and by X-ray fluorescence (XRFS) spectrometry of the powdered soil is described and the results obtained by the two techniques compared. A strong positive correlation was found between the concentration for both elements obtained by the two methods. Generally, assaying by XRFS gave higher soil lead and zinc concentrations than that determined by AAS assay of an acid extract. However, extraction by aqua regia followed by AAS provides a satisfactory method for determining the lead and zinc concentrations in soil as a routine procedure.

AB - The routine determiniation of lead and zinc in soil by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) of a hot aqua regia extract and by X-ray fluorescence (XRFS) spectrometry of the powdered soil is described and the results obtained by the two techniques compared. A strong positive correlation was found between the concentration for both elements obtained by the two methods. Generally, assaying by XRFS gave higher soil lead and zinc concentrations than that determined by AAS assay of an acid extract. However, extraction by aqua regia followed by AAS provides a satisfactory method for determining the lead and zinc concentrations in soil as a routine procedure.

KW - acid digestion

KW - heavy metals

U2 - 10.1080/00103628809367923

DO - 10.1080/00103628809367923

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0023874974

VL - 19

SP - 107

EP - 116

JO - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

JF - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

SN - 0010-3624

IS - 1

ER -