Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparisons between observable and unobservable...
View graph of relations

Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior. / Shone, Robert; Knight, Vincent; Williams, Janet.
In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 227, No. 1, 16.05.2013, p. 133-141.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Shone, R, Knight, V & Williams, J 2013, 'Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior', European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.016

APA

Vancouver

Shone R, Knight V, Williams J. Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior. European Journal of Operational Research. 2013 May 16;227(1):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.016

Author

Shone, Robert ; Knight, Vincent ; Williams, Janet. / Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior. In: European Journal of Operational Research. 2013 ; Vol. 227, No. 1. pp. 133-141.

Bibtex

@article{3bb2755ea76849809e49543e4f003fc7,
title = "Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior",
abstract = "We consider an M/M/1 queueing system in which the queue length may or may not be observable by a customer upon entering the system. The {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}observable{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}unobservable{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} models are compared with respect to system properties and performance measures under two different types of optimal customer behavior, which we refer to as {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}selfishly optimal{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}socially optimal{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. We consider average customer throughput rates and show that, under both types of optimal customer behavior, the equality of effective queue-joining rates between the observable and unobservable systems results in differences with respect to other performance measures such as mean busy periods and waiting times. We also show that the equality of selfishly optimal queue-joining rates between the two types of system precludes the equality of socially optimal joining rates, and vice versa.",
keywords = "Queueing; Customer information; Equilibrium strategies; Optimal strategies",
author = "Robert Shone and Vincent Knight and Janet Williams",
year = "2013",
month = may,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "227",
pages = "133--141",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior

AU - Shone, Robert

AU - Knight, Vincent

AU - Williams, Janet

PY - 2013/5/16

Y1 - 2013/5/16

N2 - We consider an M/M/1 queueing system in which the queue length may or may not be observable by a customer upon entering the system. The ‘‘observable’’ and ‘‘unobservable’’ models are compared with respect to system properties and performance measures under two different types of optimal customer behavior, which we refer to as ‘‘selfishly optimal’’ and ‘‘socially optimal’’. We consider average customer throughput rates and show that, under both types of optimal customer behavior, the equality of effective queue-joining rates between the observable and unobservable systems results in differences with respect to other performance measures such as mean busy periods and waiting times. We also show that the equality of selfishly optimal queue-joining rates between the two types of system precludes the equality of socially optimal joining rates, and vice versa.

AB - We consider an M/M/1 queueing system in which the queue length may or may not be observable by a customer upon entering the system. The ‘‘observable’’ and ‘‘unobservable’’ models are compared with respect to system properties and performance measures under two different types of optimal customer behavior, which we refer to as ‘‘selfishly optimal’’ and ‘‘socially optimal’’. We consider average customer throughput rates and show that, under both types of optimal customer behavior, the equality of effective queue-joining rates between the observable and unobservable systems results in differences with respect to other performance measures such as mean busy periods and waiting times. We also show that the equality of selfishly optimal queue-joining rates between the two types of system precludes the equality of socially optimal joining rates, and vice versa.

KW - Queueing; Customer information; Equilibrium strategies; Optimal strategies

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 227

SP - 133

EP - 141

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 1

ER -