Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Critical Thought, 4 (2), 2014, © Informa Plc
Submitted manuscript, 109 KB, PDF document
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Complexity, knowledge politics and the remaking of class
T2 - response to Levins
AU - Tyfield, David
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Critical Thought, 4 (2), 2014, © Informa Plc
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - The ascendancy of sciences capable of grappling with complexity is undoubtedly to be welcomed, not least in this moment of profound and overlapping systemic problems. Yet the emergence of sciences with a more sophisticated epistemology alone offers no reassurance that such knowledge will then primarily, or better, serve emancipatory and/or critical purposes. Rather, such knowledge must be treated as neither good nor bad per se, but dangerous. From this perspective, the paper explores the knowledge politics of the present conjuncture, the context for this rise of the complexity sciences. It discerns a new politics of security and “preparedness” that could well serve to construct a new dominant paradigm of complexity sciences that, to the contrary, serves primarily to construct a new “scientific” legitimacy for the egregious inequalities of the age of neoliberalism-in-crisis.
AB - The ascendancy of sciences capable of grappling with complexity is undoubtedly to be welcomed, not least in this moment of profound and overlapping systemic problems. Yet the emergence of sciences with a more sophisticated epistemology alone offers no reassurance that such knowledge will then primarily, or better, serve emancipatory and/or critical purposes. Rather, such knowledge must be treated as neither good nor bad per se, but dangerous. From this perspective, the paper explores the knowledge politics of the present conjuncture, the context for this rise of the complexity sciences. It discerns a new politics of security and “preparedness” that could well serve to construct a new dominant paradigm of complexity sciences that, to the contrary, serves primarily to construct a new “scientific” legitimacy for the egregious inequalities of the age of neoliberalism-in-crisis.
KW - Complexity
KW - Neoliberalism
KW - Preparedness
KW - Liberalism 2.0
KW - Class
U2 - 10.1080/21598282.2014.906813
DO - 10.1080/21598282.2014.906813
M3 - Journal article
VL - 4
SP - 241
EP - 254
JO - International Critical Thought
JF - International Critical Thought
SN - 2159-8312
IS - 2
ER -