Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Compliment responses in Hong Kong

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech’s Pragmatics of Politeness

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech’s Pragmatics of Politeness. / Culpeper, Jonathan; Pat, Kevin.
In: Text and Talk, Vol. 41, No. 5-6, 26.10.2021, p. 667-690.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Culpeper J, Pat K. Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech’s Pragmatics of Politeness. Text and Talk. 2021 Oct 26;41(5-6):667-690. Epub 2021 Aug 23. doi: 10.1515/text-2020-0047

Author

Bibtex

@article{d5f47bcf466f44a495859f447c294e33,
title = "Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech{\textquoteright}s Pragmatics of Politeness",
abstract = "This paper focusses on compliment responses in the context of group undergraduate student projects, in a university in Hong Kong. It applies Geoffrey Leech{\textquoteright}s model of politeness. Although less well known than some other politeness models, it has proved relatively popular in studies of compliment responses, which are often said to involve a clash between the Maxim of Agreement (achieved by agreeing with the complimenter) and the Maxim of Modesty (achieved by mitigating the compliment, thereby disagreeing with the complimenter). This study deploys Leech{\textquoteright}s most recent work on politeness in the study of compliment responses. Using an innovative variant of the discourse completion task adapted to WhatsApp to collect text messages and metapragmatic comments from undergraduate students in Hong Kong on their messages, it reveals that acceptance strategies are overwhelmingly the most frequent type. This finding adds to the small body of work on compliment responses in Hong Kong cultures, and, more generally, to cross-cultural pragmatics studies on compliment responses. However, the interpretation of this result needs to attend to the detail. The key specific acceptance strategy in our data is the expression of gratitude, and this, we argue, is best accounted for through the Maxim of Obligation, a maxim proposed in Leech{\textquoteright}s more recent work.",
keywords = "compliments, compliment responses, cross-cultural pragmatics, discourse completion task, Geoffrey Leech, politeness",
author = "Jonathan Culpeper and Kevin Pat",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/text-2020-0047",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "667--690",
journal = "Text and Talk",
issn = "1860-7330",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "5-6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compliment responses in Hong Kong

T2 - An application of Leech’s Pragmatics of Politeness

AU - Culpeper, Jonathan

AU - Pat, Kevin

PY - 2021/10/26

Y1 - 2021/10/26

N2 - This paper focusses on compliment responses in the context of group undergraduate student projects, in a university in Hong Kong. It applies Geoffrey Leech’s model of politeness. Although less well known than some other politeness models, it has proved relatively popular in studies of compliment responses, which are often said to involve a clash between the Maxim of Agreement (achieved by agreeing with the complimenter) and the Maxim of Modesty (achieved by mitigating the compliment, thereby disagreeing with the complimenter). This study deploys Leech’s most recent work on politeness in the study of compliment responses. Using an innovative variant of the discourse completion task adapted to WhatsApp to collect text messages and metapragmatic comments from undergraduate students in Hong Kong on their messages, it reveals that acceptance strategies are overwhelmingly the most frequent type. This finding adds to the small body of work on compliment responses in Hong Kong cultures, and, more generally, to cross-cultural pragmatics studies on compliment responses. However, the interpretation of this result needs to attend to the detail. The key specific acceptance strategy in our data is the expression of gratitude, and this, we argue, is best accounted for through the Maxim of Obligation, a maxim proposed in Leech’s more recent work.

AB - This paper focusses on compliment responses in the context of group undergraduate student projects, in a university in Hong Kong. It applies Geoffrey Leech’s model of politeness. Although less well known than some other politeness models, it has proved relatively popular in studies of compliment responses, which are often said to involve a clash between the Maxim of Agreement (achieved by agreeing with the complimenter) and the Maxim of Modesty (achieved by mitigating the compliment, thereby disagreeing with the complimenter). This study deploys Leech’s most recent work on politeness in the study of compliment responses. Using an innovative variant of the discourse completion task adapted to WhatsApp to collect text messages and metapragmatic comments from undergraduate students in Hong Kong on their messages, it reveals that acceptance strategies are overwhelmingly the most frequent type. This finding adds to the small body of work on compliment responses in Hong Kong cultures, and, more generally, to cross-cultural pragmatics studies on compliment responses. However, the interpretation of this result needs to attend to the detail. The key specific acceptance strategy in our data is the expression of gratitude, and this, we argue, is best accounted for through the Maxim of Obligation, a maxim proposed in Leech’s more recent work.

KW - compliments

KW - compliment responses

KW - cross-cultural pragmatics

KW - discourse completion task

KW - Geoffrey Leech

KW - politeness

U2 - 10.1515/text-2020-0047

DO - 10.1515/text-2020-0047

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 667

EP - 690

JO - Text and Talk

JF - Text and Talk

SN - 1860-7330

IS - 5-6

ER -