Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Computing the Cosmos and Us

Electronic data

  • Hoyng_Computing the cosmos and us

    Accepted author manuscript, 776 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/09/25

View graph of relations

Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Forthcoming

Standard

Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis. / Hoyng, Rolien.
Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Hoyng, R 2025, Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis. in Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

APA

Hoyng, R. (in press). Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis. In Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Oxford University Press.

Vancouver

Hoyng R. Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis. In Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2025

Author

Hoyng, Rolien. / Computing the Cosmos and Us : Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis. Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2025.

Bibtex

@inbook{68194d4f33ea462aaa54eaf0e85fefc6,
title = "Computing the Cosmos and Us: Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis",
abstract = "Societies are turning to algorithmic and computational models to tackle multiplying and intensifying ecological crises, from climate change to resource depletion and waste. The turn toward modeling aims to produce actionable knowledge at the limits of conventional epistemologies, scientific standards, and ethics. This chapter analyzes models that either gauge the thresholds of unsustainability (i.e., climate models) or prescribe pathways to sustainability (i.e., logistical models in support of the green economy). Through a discussion of proxies informed by STS and media theory, I explore the interplay of certainty/uncertainty in the modeling of socio-ecological realities that are prohibitory complex, unstable, and undecidable. My question is what kinds of political possibilities this interplay, and its engagement through global relations, open up, considered in terms of cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical dilemmas. A cosmopolitan lens highlights that modeling ecological crisis requires global coverage and involves collaboration at global scale. In turn, models enable a seemingly “total view” in support of collective intervention, much needed to safeguard human and nonhuman life. A cosmopolitical approach, however, considers the assumption of a single and common cosmos underpinning cosmopolitanism more often than not the problem rather than the remedy, and it points to the multiplicity of worldings underlying uncertainty. This chapter assesses and rethinks models as well as the engagement with the interplay of certainty/uncertainty by exploring paradoxical intersections of the cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical. ",
author = "Rolien Hoyng",
year = "2025",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Computing the Cosmos and Us

T2 - Uncertain Models of Ecological Crisis

AU - Hoyng, Rolien

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Societies are turning to algorithmic and computational models to tackle multiplying and intensifying ecological crises, from climate change to resource depletion and waste. The turn toward modeling aims to produce actionable knowledge at the limits of conventional epistemologies, scientific standards, and ethics. This chapter analyzes models that either gauge the thresholds of unsustainability (i.e., climate models) or prescribe pathways to sustainability (i.e., logistical models in support of the green economy). Through a discussion of proxies informed by STS and media theory, I explore the interplay of certainty/uncertainty in the modeling of socio-ecological realities that are prohibitory complex, unstable, and undecidable. My question is what kinds of political possibilities this interplay, and its engagement through global relations, open up, considered in terms of cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical dilemmas. A cosmopolitan lens highlights that modeling ecological crisis requires global coverage and involves collaboration at global scale. In turn, models enable a seemingly “total view” in support of collective intervention, much needed to safeguard human and nonhuman life. A cosmopolitical approach, however, considers the assumption of a single and common cosmos underpinning cosmopolitanism more often than not the problem rather than the remedy, and it points to the multiplicity of worldings underlying uncertainty. This chapter assesses and rethinks models as well as the engagement with the interplay of certainty/uncertainty by exploring paradoxical intersections of the cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical.

AB - Societies are turning to algorithmic and computational models to tackle multiplying and intensifying ecological crises, from climate change to resource depletion and waste. The turn toward modeling aims to produce actionable knowledge at the limits of conventional epistemologies, scientific standards, and ethics. This chapter analyzes models that either gauge the thresholds of unsustainability (i.e., climate models) or prescribe pathways to sustainability (i.e., logistical models in support of the green economy). Through a discussion of proxies informed by STS and media theory, I explore the interplay of certainty/uncertainty in the modeling of socio-ecological realities that are prohibitory complex, unstable, and undecidable. My question is what kinds of political possibilities this interplay, and its engagement through global relations, open up, considered in terms of cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical dilemmas. A cosmopolitan lens highlights that modeling ecological crisis requires global coverage and involves collaboration at global scale. In turn, models enable a seemingly “total view” in support of collective intervention, much needed to safeguard human and nonhuman life. A cosmopolitical approach, however, considers the assumption of a single and common cosmos underpinning cosmopolitanism more often than not the problem rather than the remedy, and it points to the multiplicity of worldings underlying uncertainty. This chapter assesses and rethinks models as well as the engagement with the interplay of certainty/uncertainty by exploring paradoxical intersections of the cosmopolitan and cosmopolitical.

M3 - Chapter

BT - Oxford Handbook of Cosmopolitanism

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -