Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Concentrations of selected volatile organic com...
View graph of relations

Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London. / Valach, Amy; Langford, Ben; Nemitz, Eiko et al.
In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 95, 10.2014, p. 456-467.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Valach A, Langford B, Nemitz E, MacKenzie R, Hewitt CN. Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London. Atmospheric Environment. 2014 Oct;95:456-467. Epub 2014 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.052

Author

Valach, Amy ; Langford, Ben ; Nemitz, Eiko et al. / Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London. In: Atmospheric Environment. 2014 ; Vol. 95. pp. 456-467.

Bibtex

@article{646e99e6279c4d48ba42eee663b8d7c1,
title = "Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London",
abstract = "Ground-level concentrations of nine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) in central London at an urban background (North Kensington, NK, during 16th–25th Jan 2012) and a kerbside site (Marylebone Rd, MRd, during 25th Jan–7th Feb 2012) as part of the winter intensive observation period of the ClearfLo project. Site comparisons indicated that VOC concentrations at the urban background site were significantly lower than at the kerbside site (ratio MRd/NK of 2.3). At the kerbside site PTR-MS measurements of aromatics (benzene, toluene, C2- and C3-benzenes) were compared with the gas chromatography – flame ionization detector data from the UK Government's Automatic Hydrocarbon Network. Very good qualitative agreement was observed between the two methods (r = 0.90–0.91, p < 0.001, N = 260), although there was a significant offset between the instruments. This was partly due to issues with humidity dependent background measurements, but possibly also from isobaric interference of other compounds and their fragments, giving a positive bias to the PTR-MS data. Most compounds showed strong indications of traffic-related sources with double rush hour peaks in diurnal profiles and high correlations with known traffic-related compounds (r = 0.68–0.97 at NK, 0.48–0.87 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 2202–2227, NMRd = 2705–2720) and CO (r = 0.80–0.96 at NK, 0.65–0.84 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 223, NMRd = 256–274). Polar plots agreed with statistical analysis of wind direction dependency and identification of potential emission sources was attempted.",
keywords = "Volatile organic compound, Mixing ratio, Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer, Automatic hydrocarbon network, ClearfLo, London in literature",
author = "Amy Valach and Ben Langford and Eiko Nemitz and Rob MacKenzie and Hewitt, {C. N.}",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.052",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "456--467",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds at kerbside and background sites in central London

AU - Valach, Amy

AU - Langford, Ben

AU - Nemitz, Eiko

AU - MacKenzie, Rob

AU - Hewitt, C. N.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Ground-level concentrations of nine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) in central London at an urban background (North Kensington, NK, during 16th–25th Jan 2012) and a kerbside site (Marylebone Rd, MRd, during 25th Jan–7th Feb 2012) as part of the winter intensive observation period of the ClearfLo project. Site comparisons indicated that VOC concentrations at the urban background site were significantly lower than at the kerbside site (ratio MRd/NK of 2.3). At the kerbside site PTR-MS measurements of aromatics (benzene, toluene, C2- and C3-benzenes) were compared with the gas chromatography – flame ionization detector data from the UK Government's Automatic Hydrocarbon Network. Very good qualitative agreement was observed between the two methods (r = 0.90–0.91, p < 0.001, N = 260), although there was a significant offset between the instruments. This was partly due to issues with humidity dependent background measurements, but possibly also from isobaric interference of other compounds and their fragments, giving a positive bias to the PTR-MS data. Most compounds showed strong indications of traffic-related sources with double rush hour peaks in diurnal profiles and high correlations with known traffic-related compounds (r = 0.68–0.97 at NK, 0.48–0.87 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 2202–2227, NMRd = 2705–2720) and CO (r = 0.80–0.96 at NK, 0.65–0.84 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 223, NMRd = 256–274). Polar plots agreed with statistical analysis of wind direction dependency and identification of potential emission sources was attempted.

AB - Ground-level concentrations of nine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) in central London at an urban background (North Kensington, NK, during 16th–25th Jan 2012) and a kerbside site (Marylebone Rd, MRd, during 25th Jan–7th Feb 2012) as part of the winter intensive observation period of the ClearfLo project. Site comparisons indicated that VOC concentrations at the urban background site were significantly lower than at the kerbside site (ratio MRd/NK of 2.3). At the kerbside site PTR-MS measurements of aromatics (benzene, toluene, C2- and C3-benzenes) were compared with the gas chromatography – flame ionization detector data from the UK Government's Automatic Hydrocarbon Network. Very good qualitative agreement was observed between the two methods (r = 0.90–0.91, p < 0.001, N = 260), although there was a significant offset between the instruments. This was partly due to issues with humidity dependent background measurements, but possibly also from isobaric interference of other compounds and their fragments, giving a positive bias to the PTR-MS data. Most compounds showed strong indications of traffic-related sources with double rush hour peaks in diurnal profiles and high correlations with known traffic-related compounds (r = 0.68–0.97 at NK, 0.48–0.87 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 2202–2227, NMRd = 2705–2720) and CO (r = 0.80–0.96 at NK, 0.65–0.84 at MRd, p < 0.001, NNK = 223, NMRd = 256–274). Polar plots agreed with statistical analysis of wind direction dependency and identification of potential emission sources was attempted.

KW - Volatile organic compound

KW - Mixing ratio

KW - Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer

KW - Automatic hydrocarbon network

KW - ClearfLo

KW - London in literature

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.052

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.052

M3 - Journal article

VL - 95

SP - 456

EP - 467

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

ER -