Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Concepts for decision making under severe uncer...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences. / Jansen, C.; Schollmeyer, G.; Augustin, T.
In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 98, 31.07.2018, p. 112-131.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jansen, C, Schollmeyer, G & Augustin, T 2018, 'Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences', International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 98, pp. 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.011

APA

Vancouver

Jansen C, Schollmeyer G, Augustin T. Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2018 Jul 31;98:112-131. Epub 2018 May 4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.011

Author

Jansen, C. ; Schollmeyer, G. ; Augustin, T. / Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences. In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2018 ; Vol. 98. pp. 112-131.

Bibtex

@article{a73af506b2f849cb86cbc690f4197675,
title = "Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences",
abstract = "We introduce three different approaches for decision making under uncertainty if (I) there is only partial (both cardinally and ordinally scaled) information on an agent's preferences and (II) the uncertainty about the states of nature is described by a credal set (or some other imprecise probabilistic model). Particularly, situation (I) is modeled by a pair of binary relations, one specifying the partial rank order of the alternatives and the other modeling partial information on the strength of preference. Our first approach relies on decision criteria constructing complete rankings of the available acts that are based on generalized expectation intervals. Subsequently, we introduce different concepts of global admissibility that construct partial orders between the available acts by comparing them all simultaneously. Finally, we define criteria induced by suitable binary relations on the set of acts and, therefore, can be understood as concepts of local admissibility. For certain criteria, we provide linear programming based algorithms for checking optimality/admissibility of acts. Additionally, the paper includes a discussion of a prototypical situation by means of a toy example.",
author = "C. Jansen and G. Schollmeyer and T. Augustin",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.011",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "112--131",
journal = "International Journal of Approximate Reasoning",
issn = "0888-613X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences

AU - Jansen, C.

AU - Schollmeyer, G.

AU - Augustin, T.

PY - 2018/7/31

Y1 - 2018/7/31

N2 - We introduce three different approaches for decision making under uncertainty if (I) there is only partial (both cardinally and ordinally scaled) information on an agent's preferences and (II) the uncertainty about the states of nature is described by a credal set (or some other imprecise probabilistic model). Particularly, situation (I) is modeled by a pair of binary relations, one specifying the partial rank order of the alternatives and the other modeling partial information on the strength of preference. Our first approach relies on decision criteria constructing complete rankings of the available acts that are based on generalized expectation intervals. Subsequently, we introduce different concepts of global admissibility that construct partial orders between the available acts by comparing them all simultaneously. Finally, we define criteria induced by suitable binary relations on the set of acts and, therefore, can be understood as concepts of local admissibility. For certain criteria, we provide linear programming based algorithms for checking optimality/admissibility of acts. Additionally, the paper includes a discussion of a prototypical situation by means of a toy example.

AB - We introduce three different approaches for decision making under uncertainty if (I) there is only partial (both cardinally and ordinally scaled) information on an agent's preferences and (II) the uncertainty about the states of nature is described by a credal set (or some other imprecise probabilistic model). Particularly, situation (I) is modeled by a pair of binary relations, one specifying the partial rank order of the alternatives and the other modeling partial information on the strength of preference. Our first approach relies on decision criteria constructing complete rankings of the available acts that are based on generalized expectation intervals. Subsequently, we introduce different concepts of global admissibility that construct partial orders between the available acts by comparing them all simultaneously. Finally, we define criteria induced by suitable binary relations on the set of acts and, therefore, can be understood as concepts of local admissibility. For certain criteria, we provide linear programming based algorithms for checking optimality/admissibility of acts. Additionally, the paper includes a discussion of a prototypical situation by means of a toy example.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.04.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 98

SP - 112

EP - 131

JO - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

JF - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

SN - 0888-613X

ER -