Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conflict in Tibet

Electronic data

  • Bijan

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Affairs on 05/05/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103

    Accepted author manuscript, 228 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conflict in Tibet: Internal and External Dimensions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Conflict in Tibet: Internal and External Dimensions . / Mukherjee, K.
In: Asian Affairs, Vol. 52, No. 2, 30.06.2021, p. 288-311.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mukherjee K. Conflict in Tibet: Internal and External Dimensions . Asian Affairs. 2021 Jun 30;52(2):288-311. Epub 2021 May 5. doi: 10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103

Author

Mukherjee, K. / Conflict in Tibet : Internal and External Dimensions . In: Asian Affairs. 2021 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 288-311.

Bibtex

@article{561aed63dbfe4f8fa413a41ed8233c7e,
title = "Conflict in Tibet: Internal and External Dimensions ",
abstract = "This article looks at the internal and external dimensions of the on-going Tibetan conflict and argues that these two facets of the conflict are intertwined and should not be viewed separately or independent of one another. Internally, the factors which have contributed to the conflict include repressive Chinese state policies such as Han migration from China proper to Tibet, economic development in Tibet as defined by the Chinese state, and the Patriotic Education Campaigns (PEC) to mention just a few. Externally, foreign powers like India and the US have been involved. India, for instance, has provided Tibetan monks and the Dalai Lama with refuge after the Chinese invasion of Tibet in the 1950s. Extensive field trips were undertaken to both India and China from 2015-2019 to carry out the research for this article. In addition to using a range of secondary source material, this article makes use of participant observation as a key research method to further its arguments. ",
keywords = "Buddhism, China, Conflict, Culture, diaspora, exiles, Identity, India, Nationalism, Tibet",
author = "K. Mukherjee",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Affairs on 05/05/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "288--311",
journal = "Asian Affairs",
issn = "0306-8374",
publisher = "Royal Central Asian Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict in Tibet

T2 - Internal and External Dimensions

AU - Mukherjee, K.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Affairs on 05/05/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103

PY - 2021/6/30

Y1 - 2021/6/30

N2 - This article looks at the internal and external dimensions of the on-going Tibetan conflict and argues that these two facets of the conflict are intertwined and should not be viewed separately or independent of one another. Internally, the factors which have contributed to the conflict include repressive Chinese state policies such as Han migration from China proper to Tibet, economic development in Tibet as defined by the Chinese state, and the Patriotic Education Campaigns (PEC) to mention just a few. Externally, foreign powers like India and the US have been involved. India, for instance, has provided Tibetan monks and the Dalai Lama with refuge after the Chinese invasion of Tibet in the 1950s. Extensive field trips were undertaken to both India and China from 2015-2019 to carry out the research for this article. In addition to using a range of secondary source material, this article makes use of participant observation as a key research method to further its arguments.

AB - This article looks at the internal and external dimensions of the on-going Tibetan conflict and argues that these two facets of the conflict are intertwined and should not be viewed separately or independent of one another. Internally, the factors which have contributed to the conflict include repressive Chinese state policies such as Han migration from China proper to Tibet, economic development in Tibet as defined by the Chinese state, and the Patriotic Education Campaigns (PEC) to mention just a few. Externally, foreign powers like India and the US have been involved. India, for instance, has provided Tibetan monks and the Dalai Lama with refuge after the Chinese invasion of Tibet in the 1950s. Extensive field trips were undertaken to both India and China from 2015-2019 to carry out the research for this article. In addition to using a range of secondary source material, this article makes use of participant observation as a key research method to further its arguments.

KW - Buddhism

KW - China

KW - Conflict

KW - Culture

KW - diaspora

KW - exiles

KW - Identity

KW - India

KW - Nationalism

KW - Tibet

U2 - 10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103

DO - 10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 288

EP - 311

JO - Asian Affairs

JF - Asian Affairs

SN - 0306-8374

IS - 2

ER -