Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18 (2), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the British Journal of Politics and International Relations page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/bpi on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 726 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Constructing a "new type of great power relations"
T2 - the state of debate in China (1998-2014)
AU - Zeng, Jinghan
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18 (2), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the British Journal of Politics and International Relations page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/bpi on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Provide the first comprehensive study of Chinese discourse of new type of great power relationsContribute to a broader understanding of how new political concepts and ideas are gradually established in ChinaUse content analysis to study 141 Chinese academic articles with title new type of great power relations' in the title'China's re-emergence as a global power has intensified its conflicts with the United States. Power transition theory suggests that the rising power and the exiting hegemony are unlikely to settle with peace. In order to manage the confrontation with the United States, China has called for establishing a 'new type of great power relations'. This article explores how this Chinese-coined concept is introduced by Chinese leaders, and subsequently filled with real meaning, in an incremental manner. It provides the first comprehensive study of the Chinese discourse of new type of great power relations using content analysis to study 141 articles written by Chinese scholars. It finds that the academic debate of this concept can be traced back to the late 1990s when China still considered itself as a normal power. China's international identity has shifted with China's rise and thus changed the contemporary debate on new type of great power relations. This article argues that there are neither predetermined strategic intentions nor real substance contained by this concept at this stage. Indeed, China itself is concerned that it may be constrained by its own concept.
AB - Provide the first comprehensive study of Chinese discourse of new type of great power relationsContribute to a broader understanding of how new political concepts and ideas are gradually established in ChinaUse content analysis to study 141 Chinese academic articles with title new type of great power relations' in the title'China's re-emergence as a global power has intensified its conflicts with the United States. Power transition theory suggests that the rising power and the exiting hegemony are unlikely to settle with peace. In order to manage the confrontation with the United States, China has called for establishing a 'new type of great power relations'. This article explores how this Chinese-coined concept is introduced by Chinese leaders, and subsequently filled with real meaning, in an incremental manner. It provides the first comprehensive study of the Chinese discourse of new type of great power relations using content analysis to study 141 articles written by Chinese scholars. It finds that the academic debate of this concept can be traced back to the late 1990s when China still considered itself as a normal power. China's international identity has shifted with China's rise and thus changed the contemporary debate on new type of great power relations. This article argues that there are neither predetermined strategic intentions nor real substance contained by this concept at this stage. Indeed, China itself is concerned that it may be constrained by its own concept.
KW - China
KW - China-US relations
KW - new type of great power relations
KW - United States
KW - RISE
KW - SCHOLARSHIP
KW - TRAGEDY
KW - ASIA
U2 - 10.1177/1369148115620991
DO - 10.1177/1369148115620991
M3 - Journal article
VL - 18
SP - 422
EP - 442
JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
SN - 1369-1481
IS - 2
ER -