Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network. / Mort, Margaret.
In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 307-313.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mort, M 1995, 'Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524214

APA

Mort, M. (1995). Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524214

Vancouver

Mort M. Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1995 Jan 1;7(3):307-313. doi: 10.1080/09537329508524214

Author

Mort, Margaret. / Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1995 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 307-313.

Bibtex

@article{c2b1de50b849423aac1eec3968f1fd68,
title = "Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network",
abstract = "This paper draws upon the traditions of social construction of technology and actor–network theory, in an attempt to show that just as these approaches have been used to expose the contingent nature of {\textquoteleft}technical{\textquoteright} change, they can also be adapted to show the contingency of the {\textquoteleft}social{\textquoteright} aspects of technology, such as redundancy and technological unemployment, which have in recent years assumed an almost unassailable sense of inevitability. This process is begun when technology is viewed as a social network. Then, focusing on the production phase in the life cycle of a technical system, it is argued here that the jettisoning of both people and technical resources from the network may get presented as part of technology{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}natural{\textquoteright} trajectory, but is often part of the (socio-technical) {\textquoteleft}heterogenous engineering{\textquoteright} necessary for the stabilization of that technology, and consequently need not be seen as inevitable.",
author = "Margaret Mort",
year = "1995",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09537329508524214",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "307--313",
journal = "Technology Analysis & Strategic Management",
issn = "0953-7325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Trident, Reinforcing the Network

AU - Mort, Margaret

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - This paper draws upon the traditions of social construction of technology and actor–network theory, in an attempt to show that just as these approaches have been used to expose the contingent nature of ‘technical’ change, they can also be adapted to show the contingency of the ‘social’ aspects of technology, such as redundancy and technological unemployment, which have in recent years assumed an almost unassailable sense of inevitability. This process is begun when technology is viewed as a social network. Then, focusing on the production phase in the life cycle of a technical system, it is argued here that the jettisoning of both people and technical resources from the network may get presented as part of technology’s ‘natural’ trajectory, but is often part of the (socio-technical) ‘heterogenous engineering’ necessary for the stabilization of that technology, and consequently need not be seen as inevitable.

AB - This paper draws upon the traditions of social construction of technology and actor–network theory, in an attempt to show that just as these approaches have been used to expose the contingent nature of ‘technical’ change, they can also be adapted to show the contingency of the ‘social’ aspects of technology, such as redundancy and technological unemployment, which have in recent years assumed an almost unassailable sense of inevitability. This process is begun when technology is viewed as a social network. Then, focusing on the production phase in the life cycle of a technical system, it is argued here that the jettisoning of both people and technical resources from the network may get presented as part of technology’s ‘natural’ trajectory, but is often part of the (socio-technical) ‘heterogenous engineering’ necessary for the stabilization of that technology, and consequently need not be seen as inevitable.

U2 - 10.1080/09537329508524214

DO - 10.1080/09537329508524214

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0029511462

VL - 7

SP - 307

EP - 313

JO - Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

JF - Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

SN - 0953-7325

IS - 3

ER -