Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and ...
View graph of relations

Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections. / Pidd, M.
Lancaster University: The Department of Management Science, 2003. (Management Science Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Pidd, M 2003 'Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections' Management Science Working Paper Series, The Department of Management Science, Lancaster University.

APA

Pidd, M. (2003). Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections. (Management Science Working Paper Series). The Department of Management Science.

Vancouver

Pidd M. Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections. Lancaster University: The Department of Management Science. 2003. (Management Science Working Paper Series).

Author

Pidd, M. / Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections. Lancaster University : The Department of Management Science, 2003. (Management Science Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{2383cd98d8524c519f1505955f71d453,
title = "Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections",
abstract = "It is now widely accepted that strategy making and policy development require both rational analysis and an ability to work with insights that are sometime hard to pin down. Operational research has made major contributions to strategy development, though there has been a tendency to argue that greater use of substantive rationality is needed. By contrast, alterative rationalities such as the procedural rationality suggested by Simon, provides a clear rationale for the demonstrable success of some soft OR methods in strategy development. In addition, the suggestion of Sagasti that metaphor and language are powerful tools in strategising also needs to be taken seriously",
keywords = "strategic planning, soft OR, methodology",
author = "M Pidd",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
series = "Management Science Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Management Science",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Management Science",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections

AU - Pidd, M

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - It is now widely accepted that strategy making and policy development require both rational analysis and an ability to work with insights that are sometime hard to pin down. Operational research has made major contributions to strategy development, though there has been a tendency to argue that greater use of substantive rationality is needed. By contrast, alterative rationalities such as the procedural rationality suggested by Simon, provides a clear rationale for the demonstrable success of some soft OR methods in strategy development. In addition, the suggestion of Sagasti that metaphor and language are powerful tools in strategising also needs to be taken seriously

AB - It is now widely accepted that strategy making and policy development require both rational analysis and an ability to work with insights that are sometime hard to pin down. Operational research has made major contributions to strategy development, though there has been a tendency to argue that greater use of substantive rationality is needed. By contrast, alterative rationalities such as the procedural rationality suggested by Simon, provides a clear rationale for the demonstrable success of some soft OR methods in strategy development. In addition, the suggestion of Sagasti that metaphor and language are powerful tools in strategising also needs to be taken seriously

KW - strategic planning

KW - soft OR

KW - methodology

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Management Science Working Paper Series

BT - Contemporary OR/MS in strategy development and policy making: some reflections

PB - The Department of Management Science

CY - Lancaster University

ER -