Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Content type and perceived multimedia quality i...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning. / Molnar, Andreea.

In: Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 76, No. 20, 10.2017, p. 21613–21627.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Molnar, A 2017, 'Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning', Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 76, no. 20, pp. 21613–21627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2

APA

Vancouver

Molnar A. Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2017 Oct;76(20):21613–21627. Epub 2016 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2

Author

Molnar, Andreea. / Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning. In: Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2017 ; Vol. 76, No. 20. pp. 21613–21627.

Bibtex

@article{8d24caa76e144cda92b8cf9c111a3f44,
title = "Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning",
abstract = "The increased usage of mobile devices for learning purposes raises several concerns regarding how this adaptation affects learning and perceived quality of educational content across different screen resolutions. This research looks into how educational content type and video adaptation affect the perceived quality of multimedia educational content on two different mobile devices. We consider seven different categories of educational content: slideshow, screencast, presentation, lab demo, interview, documentary, and animation. The results show that the participants could learn regardless of the video content type and the adapted version of the video. We found no statistical significant difference between the perceived quality of the highest quality video and the lower quality video for two of the categories (lab demo and interview) and statistical significant difference on the remaining ones. The implications of this study are also discussed.",
keywords = "Content category , Mobile learning, Perceived video quality, Quality of experience , Screen size , Video based learning",
author = "Andreea Molnar",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "21613–21627",
journal = "Multimedia Tools and Applications",
issn = "1380-7501",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "20",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning

AU - Molnar, Andreea

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - The increased usage of mobile devices for learning purposes raises several concerns regarding how this adaptation affects learning and perceived quality of educational content across different screen resolutions. This research looks into how educational content type and video adaptation affect the perceived quality of multimedia educational content on two different mobile devices. We consider seven different categories of educational content: slideshow, screencast, presentation, lab demo, interview, documentary, and animation. The results show that the participants could learn regardless of the video content type and the adapted version of the video. We found no statistical significant difference between the perceived quality of the highest quality video and the lower quality video for two of the categories (lab demo and interview) and statistical significant difference on the remaining ones. The implications of this study are also discussed.

AB - The increased usage of mobile devices for learning purposes raises several concerns regarding how this adaptation affects learning and perceived quality of educational content across different screen resolutions. This research looks into how educational content type and video adaptation affect the perceived quality of multimedia educational content on two different mobile devices. We consider seven different categories of educational content: slideshow, screencast, presentation, lab demo, interview, documentary, and animation. The results show that the participants could learn regardless of the video content type and the adapted version of the video. We found no statistical significant difference between the perceived quality of the highest quality video and the lower quality video for two of the categories (lab demo and interview) and statistical significant difference on the remaining ones. The implications of this study are also discussed.

KW - Content category

KW - Mobile learning

KW - Perceived video quality

KW - Quality of experience

KW - Screen size

KW - Video based learning

U2 - 10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2

DO - 10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 76

SP - 21613

EP - 21627

JO - Multimedia Tools and Applications

JF - Multimedia Tools and Applications

SN - 1380-7501

IS - 20

ER -