Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal. / Rana, Kumud.
Bodies in Resistance. Palgrave McMillan , 2016. p. 95-115.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rana K. Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal. In Bodies in Resistance. Palgrave McMillan . 2016. p. 95-115 doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_5

Author

Rana, Kumud. / Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal. Bodies in Resistance. Palgrave McMillan , 2016. pp. 95-115

Bibtex

@inbook{3bbe06f48365454cb855bcdc45035030,
title = "Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal",
abstract = "The idea of citizens as rights-bearing bodies continues to be an important political tool for women through which to claim space as legitimate actors who have the right to equality under the law. However, in this process of seeking legitimacy from the state, women{\textquoteright}s bodies continue to be entangled between the normalizing and essentializing forces of nationalism which positions them as second-class citizens. Taking the case of a constitutional debate over the right of Nepali mothers to pass on citizenship to their children irrespective of the nationality of the father, this chapter explores how the female body continues to be normalised as a mere biological reproducer of the nation, without equal rights as citizens of that nation. More importantly, the chapter further shows how women{\textquoteright}s resistance to such discrimination might rely on the same masculine and exclusionary interpretations of nationalism. The chapter draws from in-depth interviews with key constituent assembly members writing a new constitution for Nepal after the dissolution of monarchy in 2008. The chapter argues how a neoliberal understanding of citizenship goes hand in hand with the neoliberal interpretation of women{\textquoteright}s empowerment, which often overlooks the importance of how intersections of different identities affect the lived experiences of different groups of women. In the case of Nepal, this interpretation of citizenship has overlooked intersecting discriminations based on caste, ethnicity and sexual orientation, thus homogenizing the category of “Nepali women” and dictating what a unified agenda for the Nepali women{\textquoteright}s movement ought to be. While it is true that the embodied experience of the female body often becomes an entry point for women{\textquoteright}s political engagement, the chapter highlights the limitations this might pose. It shows how bodies are often inscribed by dominant political and sociocultural structures in such a way that within the biopolitics of national sovereignty, some (female) bodies might matter more than others.",
author = "Kumud Rana",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781137477798",
pages = "95--115",
booktitle = "Bodies in Resistance",
publisher = "Palgrave McMillan ",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Contesting Bodies in the Constitutional Debate About Citizenship in Nepal

AU - Rana, Kumud

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The idea of citizens as rights-bearing bodies continues to be an important political tool for women through which to claim space as legitimate actors who have the right to equality under the law. However, in this process of seeking legitimacy from the state, women’s bodies continue to be entangled between the normalizing and essentializing forces of nationalism which positions them as second-class citizens. Taking the case of a constitutional debate over the right of Nepali mothers to pass on citizenship to their children irrespective of the nationality of the father, this chapter explores how the female body continues to be normalised as a mere biological reproducer of the nation, without equal rights as citizens of that nation. More importantly, the chapter further shows how women’s resistance to such discrimination might rely on the same masculine and exclusionary interpretations of nationalism. The chapter draws from in-depth interviews with key constituent assembly members writing a new constitution for Nepal after the dissolution of monarchy in 2008. The chapter argues how a neoliberal understanding of citizenship goes hand in hand with the neoliberal interpretation of women’s empowerment, which often overlooks the importance of how intersections of different identities affect the lived experiences of different groups of women. In the case of Nepal, this interpretation of citizenship has overlooked intersecting discriminations based on caste, ethnicity and sexual orientation, thus homogenizing the category of “Nepali women” and dictating what a unified agenda for the Nepali women’s movement ought to be. While it is true that the embodied experience of the female body often becomes an entry point for women’s political engagement, the chapter highlights the limitations this might pose. It shows how bodies are often inscribed by dominant political and sociocultural structures in such a way that within the biopolitics of national sovereignty, some (female) bodies might matter more than others.

AB - The idea of citizens as rights-bearing bodies continues to be an important political tool for women through which to claim space as legitimate actors who have the right to equality under the law. However, in this process of seeking legitimacy from the state, women’s bodies continue to be entangled between the normalizing and essentializing forces of nationalism which positions them as second-class citizens. Taking the case of a constitutional debate over the right of Nepali mothers to pass on citizenship to their children irrespective of the nationality of the father, this chapter explores how the female body continues to be normalised as a mere biological reproducer of the nation, without equal rights as citizens of that nation. More importantly, the chapter further shows how women’s resistance to such discrimination might rely on the same masculine and exclusionary interpretations of nationalism. The chapter draws from in-depth interviews with key constituent assembly members writing a new constitution for Nepal after the dissolution of monarchy in 2008. The chapter argues how a neoliberal understanding of citizenship goes hand in hand with the neoliberal interpretation of women’s empowerment, which often overlooks the importance of how intersections of different identities affect the lived experiences of different groups of women. In the case of Nepal, this interpretation of citizenship has overlooked intersecting discriminations based on caste, ethnicity and sexual orientation, thus homogenizing the category of “Nepali women” and dictating what a unified agenda for the Nepali women’s movement ought to be. While it is true that the embodied experience of the female body often becomes an entry point for women’s political engagement, the chapter highlights the limitations this might pose. It shows how bodies are often inscribed by dominant political and sociocultural structures in such a way that within the biopolitics of national sovereignty, some (female) bodies might matter more than others.

U2 - 10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_5

DO - 10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781137477798

SN - 9781349693351

SP - 95

EP - 115

BT - Bodies in Resistance

PB - Palgrave McMillan

ER -