Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Continuants, Identity and Essentialism

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Continuants, Identity and Essentialism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Continuants, Identity and Essentialism. / Unwin, Nicholas Leslie.
In: Synthese, Vol. 197, 30.07.2020, p. 3375–3394.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Unwin NL. Continuants, Identity and Essentialism. Synthese. 2020 Jul 30;197:3375–3394. Epub 2018 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1891-8

Author

Unwin, Nicholas Leslie. / Continuants, Identity and Essentialism. In: Synthese. 2020 ; Vol. 197. pp. 3375–3394.

Bibtex

@article{5a057c131cda478693010f87022b3c8f,
title = "Continuants, Identity and Essentialism",
abstract = "The question of whether it is permissible to quantify into a modal context is re-examined from an empiricist perspective. Following Wiggins, it is argued that an ontology of continuants implies essentialism, but it is also argued, against Wiggins, that the only conception of necessity that we need to start out with is that of analyticity. Essentialism, of a limited kind, can then be actually generated from this. An exceptionally fine-grained identity criterion for continuants is defended in this context. The debate between Wiggins and Ayer over the legitimacy of de re modality is then examined in the light of these results, and it is argued that my position is consistent with Ayer{\textquoteright}s minimalist assumptions. It is also argued that non-continuants will not sustain the essential/accidental distinction, thus giving some concessions to the sceptics. It is also shown that there are close connections between these issues and the more modern two-dimensionalist way of disentangling the necessary from the a posteriori, and that the latter needs to learn from the former.",
keywords = "Continuant, Identity, Essentialism , de re modality, Sortal , David Wiggins , A.J. Ayer ",
author = "Unwin, {Nicholas Leslie}",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-018-1891-8",
language = "English",
volume = "197",
pages = "3375–3394",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuants, Identity and Essentialism

AU - Unwin, Nicholas Leslie

PY - 2020/7/30

Y1 - 2020/7/30

N2 - The question of whether it is permissible to quantify into a modal context is re-examined from an empiricist perspective. Following Wiggins, it is argued that an ontology of continuants implies essentialism, but it is also argued, against Wiggins, that the only conception of necessity that we need to start out with is that of analyticity. Essentialism, of a limited kind, can then be actually generated from this. An exceptionally fine-grained identity criterion for continuants is defended in this context. The debate between Wiggins and Ayer over the legitimacy of de re modality is then examined in the light of these results, and it is argued that my position is consistent with Ayer’s minimalist assumptions. It is also argued that non-continuants will not sustain the essential/accidental distinction, thus giving some concessions to the sceptics. It is also shown that there are close connections between these issues and the more modern two-dimensionalist way of disentangling the necessary from the a posteriori, and that the latter needs to learn from the former.

AB - The question of whether it is permissible to quantify into a modal context is re-examined from an empiricist perspective. Following Wiggins, it is argued that an ontology of continuants implies essentialism, but it is also argued, against Wiggins, that the only conception of necessity that we need to start out with is that of analyticity. Essentialism, of a limited kind, can then be actually generated from this. An exceptionally fine-grained identity criterion for continuants is defended in this context. The debate between Wiggins and Ayer over the legitimacy of de re modality is then examined in the light of these results, and it is argued that my position is consistent with Ayer’s minimalist assumptions. It is also argued that non-continuants will not sustain the essential/accidental distinction, thus giving some concessions to the sceptics. It is also shown that there are close connections between these issues and the more modern two-dimensionalist way of disentangling the necessary from the a posteriori, and that the latter needs to learn from the former.

KW - Continuant

KW - Identity

KW - Essentialism

KW - de re modality

KW - Sortal

KW - David Wiggins

KW - A.J. Ayer

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-018-1891-8

DO - 10.1007/s11229-018-1891-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 197

SP - 3375

EP - 3394

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

ER -