Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Controlling crack formation and porosity in las...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: Alloy design and process optimisation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: Alloy design and process optimisation. / Sabzi, H.E.; Maeng, S.; Liang, X. et al.
In: Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 34, 101360, 01.08.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sabzi HE, Maeng S, Liang X, Simonelli M, Aboulkhair NT, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PEJ. Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: Alloy design and process optimisation. Additive Manufacturing. 2020 Aug 1;34:101360. Epub 2020 Jun 12. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360

Author

Sabzi, H.E. ; Maeng, S. ; Liang, X. et al. / Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion : Alloy design and process optimisation. In: Additive Manufacturing. 2020 ; Vol. 34.

Bibtex

@article{34511915c6f94930b6defae2a8afb22a,
title = "Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: Alloy design and process optimisation",
abstract = "A computational method is presented to design alloys of lower susceptibility to solidification cracking, while preventing the formation of porosity and defects during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). The method is developed for austenitic stainless steels, on which a wealth of data are available as various conditions for crack and pore/defect formation have been reported. The model is based on an alloy design approach combining thermodynamic calculations with a genetic algorithm to discover novel austenitic stainless steel compositions; the new alloys are expected to be crack-free whilst showing improved strength. A new crack prevention factor is proposed to relate composition to solidification crack formation. The factor incorporates quantitative criteria for the solidification temperature range, the performance index (ratio between yield stress and coefficient of thermal expansion) and the solidification path. Overall, the design methodology is validated by literature data on 316L austenitic stainless steel. Although cracking is not an issue during LPBF of 316L stainless steel, this material is a good choice to show under which conditions the cracks form. As for porosity and defect prevention, it is shown how this can be achieved by providing a sufficient amount of energy to melt the powder bed, and by controlling the melt pool geometry; such criteria are dissimilar to those reported in the literature. Process maps have been developed to show the effects of process parameters on the formation of pores and defects based on the proposed criteria. The model is applied to optimise such parameters to produce 316L austenitic stainless steel, and it is shown that a defect-free LPBFed stainless steel can be achieved, performing better under tensile testing compared to its wrought counterpart. The conditions for the application of such model to other alloy families displaying cracking, such as marageing steels and nickel alloys, are discussed.",
keywords = "Additive manufacturing, Austenitic stainless steel, Laser powder bed fusion, Porosity, Solidification cracking, Cracks, Design, Genetic algorithms, Nickel alloys, Solidification, Tensile testing, Thermal expansion, Yield stress, 316 L stainless steel, 316L austenitic stainless steel, Quantitative criteria, Solidification cracks, Solidification paths, Solidification temperature, Thermodynamic calculations",
author = "H.E. Sabzi and S. Maeng and X. Liang and M. Simonelli and N.T. Aboulkhair and P.E.J. Rivera-D{\'i}az-del-Castillo",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion

T2 - Alloy design and process optimisation

AU - Sabzi, H.E.

AU - Maeng, S.

AU - Liang, X.

AU - Simonelli, M.

AU - Aboulkhair, N.T.

AU - Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, P.E.J.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - A computational method is presented to design alloys of lower susceptibility to solidification cracking, while preventing the formation of porosity and defects during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). The method is developed for austenitic stainless steels, on which a wealth of data are available as various conditions for crack and pore/defect formation have been reported. The model is based on an alloy design approach combining thermodynamic calculations with a genetic algorithm to discover novel austenitic stainless steel compositions; the new alloys are expected to be crack-free whilst showing improved strength. A new crack prevention factor is proposed to relate composition to solidification crack formation. The factor incorporates quantitative criteria for the solidification temperature range, the performance index (ratio between yield stress and coefficient of thermal expansion) and the solidification path. Overall, the design methodology is validated by literature data on 316L austenitic stainless steel. Although cracking is not an issue during LPBF of 316L stainless steel, this material is a good choice to show under which conditions the cracks form. As for porosity and defect prevention, it is shown how this can be achieved by providing a sufficient amount of energy to melt the powder bed, and by controlling the melt pool geometry; such criteria are dissimilar to those reported in the literature. Process maps have been developed to show the effects of process parameters on the formation of pores and defects based on the proposed criteria. The model is applied to optimise such parameters to produce 316L austenitic stainless steel, and it is shown that a defect-free LPBFed stainless steel can be achieved, performing better under tensile testing compared to its wrought counterpart. The conditions for the application of such model to other alloy families displaying cracking, such as marageing steels and nickel alloys, are discussed.

AB - A computational method is presented to design alloys of lower susceptibility to solidification cracking, while preventing the formation of porosity and defects during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). The method is developed for austenitic stainless steels, on which a wealth of data are available as various conditions for crack and pore/defect formation have been reported. The model is based on an alloy design approach combining thermodynamic calculations with a genetic algorithm to discover novel austenitic stainless steel compositions; the new alloys are expected to be crack-free whilst showing improved strength. A new crack prevention factor is proposed to relate composition to solidification crack formation. The factor incorporates quantitative criteria for the solidification temperature range, the performance index (ratio between yield stress and coefficient of thermal expansion) and the solidification path. Overall, the design methodology is validated by literature data on 316L austenitic stainless steel. Although cracking is not an issue during LPBF of 316L stainless steel, this material is a good choice to show under which conditions the cracks form. As for porosity and defect prevention, it is shown how this can be achieved by providing a sufficient amount of energy to melt the powder bed, and by controlling the melt pool geometry; such criteria are dissimilar to those reported in the literature. Process maps have been developed to show the effects of process parameters on the formation of pores and defects based on the proposed criteria. The model is applied to optimise such parameters to produce 316L austenitic stainless steel, and it is shown that a defect-free LPBFed stainless steel can be achieved, performing better under tensile testing compared to its wrought counterpart. The conditions for the application of such model to other alloy families displaying cracking, such as marageing steels and nickel alloys, are discussed.

KW - Additive manufacturing

KW - Austenitic stainless steel

KW - Laser powder bed fusion

KW - Porosity

KW - Solidification cracking

KW - Cracks

KW - Design

KW - Genetic algorithms

KW - Nickel alloys

KW - Solidification

KW - Tensile testing

KW - Thermal expansion

KW - Yield stress

KW - 316 L stainless steel

KW - 316L austenitic stainless steel

KW - Quantitative criteria

KW - Solidification cracks

KW - Solidification paths

KW - Solidification temperature

KW - Thermodynamic calculations

U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360

DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

JO - Additive Manufacturing

JF - Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2214-8604

M1 - 101360

ER -