Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke...

Electronic data

  • CiGüMiGo2016_NeuroImage

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in NeuroImage. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in NeuroImage, 139, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020

    Accepted author manuscript, 4.6 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. / Citron, Francesca Maria Marina; Güsten, Jeremie; Michaelis, Nora; Goldberg, Adele E.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 139, 29.06.2016, p. 218-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Citron, Francesca Maria Marina ; Güsten, Jeremie ; Michaelis, Nora ; Goldberg, Adele E. / Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. In: NeuroImage. 2016 ; Vol. 139. pp. 218-230.

Bibtex

@article{9f6ddd564be943e4b4938ce9587130b9,
title = "Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response",
abstract = "Conventional metaphorical sentences such as She{\textquoteright}s a sweet child have been found to elicit greater amygdala activation than matched literal sentences (e.g., She{\textquoteright}s a kind child). In the present fMRI study, this finding is strengthened and extended with naturalistic stimuli involving longer passages and a range of conventional metaphors. In particular, a greater number of activation peaks (four) were found in the bilateral amygdala when passages containing conventional metaphors were read than when their matched literal versions were read (a single peak); while the direct contrast between metaphorical and literal passages did not show significant amygdala activation, parametric analysis revealed that BOLD signal changes in the left amygdala correlated with an increase in metaphoricity ratings across all stories. Moreover, while a measure of complexity was positively correlated with an increase in activation of a broad bilateral network mainly involving the temporal lobes, complexity was not predictive of amygdala activity. Thus, the results suggest that amygdala activation is not simply a result of stronger overall activity related to language comprehension, but is more specific to the processing of metaphorical language.",
keywords = "conventional metaphors, text, discourse, Amygdala, fMRI, emotion",
author = "Citron, {Francesca Maria Marina} and Jeremie G{\"u}sten and Nora Michaelis and Goldberg, {Adele E.}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in NeuroImage. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in NeuroImage, 139, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "218--230",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response

AU - Citron, Francesca Maria Marina

AU - Güsten, Jeremie

AU - Michaelis, Nora

AU - Goldberg, Adele E.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in NeuroImage. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in NeuroImage, 139, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020

PY - 2016/6/29

Y1 - 2016/6/29

N2 - Conventional metaphorical sentences such as She’s a sweet child have been found to elicit greater amygdala activation than matched literal sentences (e.g., She’s a kind child). In the present fMRI study, this finding is strengthened and extended with naturalistic stimuli involving longer passages and a range of conventional metaphors. In particular, a greater number of activation peaks (four) were found in the bilateral amygdala when passages containing conventional metaphors were read than when their matched literal versions were read (a single peak); while the direct contrast between metaphorical and literal passages did not show significant amygdala activation, parametric analysis revealed that BOLD signal changes in the left amygdala correlated with an increase in metaphoricity ratings across all stories. Moreover, while a measure of complexity was positively correlated with an increase in activation of a broad bilateral network mainly involving the temporal lobes, complexity was not predictive of amygdala activity. Thus, the results suggest that amygdala activation is not simply a result of stronger overall activity related to language comprehension, but is more specific to the processing of metaphorical language.

AB - Conventional metaphorical sentences such as She’s a sweet child have been found to elicit greater amygdala activation than matched literal sentences (e.g., She’s a kind child). In the present fMRI study, this finding is strengthened and extended with naturalistic stimuli involving longer passages and a range of conventional metaphors. In particular, a greater number of activation peaks (four) were found in the bilateral amygdala when passages containing conventional metaphors were read than when their matched literal versions were read (a single peak); while the direct contrast between metaphorical and literal passages did not show significant amygdala activation, parametric analysis revealed that BOLD signal changes in the left amygdala correlated with an increase in metaphoricity ratings across all stories. Moreover, while a measure of complexity was positively correlated with an increase in activation of a broad bilateral network mainly involving the temporal lobes, complexity was not predictive of amygdala activity. Thus, the results suggest that amygdala activation is not simply a result of stronger overall activity related to language comprehension, but is more specific to the processing of metaphorical language.

KW - conventional metaphors

KW - text

KW - discourse

KW - Amygdala

KW - fMRI

KW - emotion

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 139

SP - 218

EP - 230

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -