Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's re...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development. / Wei, Y; Liu, X.
Lancaster University: The Department of Economics, 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Wei, Y & Liu, X 2004 'Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development' Economics Working Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

APA

Wei, Y., & Liu, X. (2004). Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development. (Economics Working Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Wei Y, Liu X. Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development. Lancaster University: The Department of Economics. 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Wei, Y ; Liu, X. / Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development. Lancaster University : The Department of Economics, 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{ab9185063203404db0d40d053b6cc14c,
title = "Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development",
abstract = "This paper investigates the evolution of regional disparity over the period 1980-2001, reviews the debate on its causes, discusses future development strategies, and draws relevant conclusions for policymakers. Our study confirms that overall regional disparity declined in the 1980s but increased in the 1990s. The gap between the inland and coastal regions was the dominant contributor to the overall regional disparity. There was no club convergence within the inland and coastal regions. Economic, geographical and historical factors put the coast in a better position than the inland for growth. Regional development strategies and policies, globalisation and economic liberalisation, and factor market distortions, which are closely linked with each other, have played an important role in regional disparity. It will be a long-term task to significantly reduce regional disparity. The Chinese central government needs to (1) allow a similar degree of openness and economic liberalisation across regions; (2) work out detailed procedures to remove barriers to the movement of factors of production; (3) provide industrial development guidelines; and (4) help the establishment of better infrastructure in the inland and especially the west, and encourage resource allocation based on comparative advantages",
author = "Y Wei and X Liu",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development

AU - Wei, Y

AU - Liu, X

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper investigates the evolution of regional disparity over the period 1980-2001, reviews the debate on its causes, discusses future development strategies, and draws relevant conclusions for policymakers. Our study confirms that overall regional disparity declined in the 1980s but increased in the 1990s. The gap between the inland and coastal regions was the dominant contributor to the overall regional disparity. There was no club convergence within the inland and coastal regions. Economic, geographical and historical factors put the coast in a better position than the inland for growth. Regional development strategies and policies, globalisation and economic liberalisation, and factor market distortions, which are closely linked with each other, have played an important role in regional disparity. It will be a long-term task to significantly reduce regional disparity. The Chinese central government needs to (1) allow a similar degree of openness and economic liberalisation across regions; (2) work out detailed procedures to remove barriers to the movement of factors of production; (3) provide industrial development guidelines; and (4) help the establishment of better infrastructure in the inland and especially the west, and encourage resource allocation based on comparative advantages

AB - This paper investigates the evolution of regional disparity over the period 1980-2001, reviews the debate on its causes, discusses future development strategies, and draws relevant conclusions for policymakers. Our study confirms that overall regional disparity declined in the 1980s but increased in the 1990s. The gap between the inland and coastal regions was the dominant contributor to the overall regional disparity. There was no club convergence within the inland and coastal regions. Economic, geographical and historical factors put the coast in a better position than the inland for growth. Regional development strategies and policies, globalisation and economic liberalisation, and factor market distortions, which are closely linked with each other, have played an important role in regional disparity. It will be a long-term task to significantly reduce regional disparity. The Chinese central government needs to (1) allow a similar degree of openness and economic liberalisation across regions; (2) work out detailed procedures to remove barriers to the movement of factors of production; (3) provide industrial development guidelines; and (4) help the establishment of better infrastructure in the inland and especially the west, and encourage resource allocation based on comparative advantages

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Convergence or divergence? Debate on China's regional development

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster University

ER -