Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-c...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone. / Liu, Z.; Doherty, Ruth M.; Wild, O. et al.
In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 22, No. 18, 26.09.2022, p. 12543-12557.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Liu, Z, Doherty, RM, Wild, O, O'Connor, FM & Turnock, ST 2022, 'Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 12543-12557. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022

APA

Liu, Z., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., O'Connor, F. M., & Turnock, S. T. (2022). Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(18), 12543-12557. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022

Vancouver

Liu Z, Doherty RM, Wild O, O'Connor FM, Turnock ST. Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2022 Sept 26;22(18):12543-12557. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022

Author

Liu, Z. ; Doherty, Ruth M. ; Wild, O. et al. / Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2022 ; Vol. 22, No. 18. pp. 12543-12557.

Bibtex

@article{9178880a700c4b3bb44d2fb5cc302c0d,
title = "Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone",
abstract = "Weaknesses in process representation in chemistry–climate models lead to biases in simulating surface ozone and to uncertainty in projections of future ozone change. We here develop a deep learning model to demonstrate the feasibility of ozone bias correction in a global chemistry–climate model. We apply this approach to identify the key factors causing ozone biases and to correct projections of future surface ozone. Temperature and the related geographic variables latitude and month show the strongest relationship with ozone biases. This indicates that ozone biases are sensitive to temperature and suggests weaknesses in representation of temperature-sensitive physical or chemical processes. Photolysis rates are also an important factor, highlighting the sensitivity of biases to simulated cloud cover and insolation. Atmospheric chemical species such as the hydroxyl radical, nitric acid and peroxyacyl nitrate show strong positive relationships with ozone biases on a regional scale. These relationships reveal the conditions under which ozone biases occur, although they reflect association rather than direct causation. We correct model projections of future ozone under different climate and emission scenarios following the shared socio-economic pathways. We find that changes in seasonal ozone mixing ratios from the present day to the future are generally smaller than those simulated without bias correction, especially in high-emission regions. This suggests that the ozone sensitivity to changing emissions and climate may be overestimated with chemistry–climate models. Given the uncertainty in simulating future ozone, we show that deep learning approaches can provide improved assessment of the impacts of climate and emission changes on future air quality, along with valuable information to guide future model development.",
keywords = "Surface ozone, Numerical modelling, bias correction, Machine learning, Neural network, Climate change, Air quality",
author = "Z. Liu and Doherty, {Ruth M.} and O. Wild and O'Connor, {Fiona M.} and Turnock, {S. T.}",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "26",
doi = "10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "12543--12557",
journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",
issn = "1680-7316",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH (Copernicus Publications) on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)",
number = "18",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry-climate model: implications for future ozone

AU - Liu, Z.

AU - Doherty, Ruth M.

AU - Wild, O.

AU - O'Connor, Fiona M.

AU - Turnock, S. T.

PY - 2022/9/26

Y1 - 2022/9/26

N2 - Weaknesses in process representation in chemistry–climate models lead to biases in simulating surface ozone and to uncertainty in projections of future ozone change. We here develop a deep learning model to demonstrate the feasibility of ozone bias correction in a global chemistry–climate model. We apply this approach to identify the key factors causing ozone biases and to correct projections of future surface ozone. Temperature and the related geographic variables latitude and month show the strongest relationship with ozone biases. This indicates that ozone biases are sensitive to temperature and suggests weaknesses in representation of temperature-sensitive physical or chemical processes. Photolysis rates are also an important factor, highlighting the sensitivity of biases to simulated cloud cover and insolation. Atmospheric chemical species such as the hydroxyl radical, nitric acid and peroxyacyl nitrate show strong positive relationships with ozone biases on a regional scale. These relationships reveal the conditions under which ozone biases occur, although they reflect association rather than direct causation. We correct model projections of future ozone under different climate and emission scenarios following the shared socio-economic pathways. We find that changes in seasonal ozone mixing ratios from the present day to the future are generally smaller than those simulated without bias correction, especially in high-emission regions. This suggests that the ozone sensitivity to changing emissions and climate may be overestimated with chemistry–climate models. Given the uncertainty in simulating future ozone, we show that deep learning approaches can provide improved assessment of the impacts of climate and emission changes on future air quality, along with valuable information to guide future model development.

AB - Weaknesses in process representation in chemistry–climate models lead to biases in simulating surface ozone and to uncertainty in projections of future ozone change. We here develop a deep learning model to demonstrate the feasibility of ozone bias correction in a global chemistry–climate model. We apply this approach to identify the key factors causing ozone biases and to correct projections of future surface ozone. Temperature and the related geographic variables latitude and month show the strongest relationship with ozone biases. This indicates that ozone biases are sensitive to temperature and suggests weaknesses in representation of temperature-sensitive physical or chemical processes. Photolysis rates are also an important factor, highlighting the sensitivity of biases to simulated cloud cover and insolation. Atmospheric chemical species such as the hydroxyl radical, nitric acid and peroxyacyl nitrate show strong positive relationships with ozone biases on a regional scale. These relationships reveal the conditions under which ozone biases occur, although they reflect association rather than direct causation. We correct model projections of future ozone under different climate and emission scenarios following the shared socio-economic pathways. We find that changes in seasonal ozone mixing ratios from the present day to the future are generally smaller than those simulated without bias correction, especially in high-emission regions. This suggests that the ozone sensitivity to changing emissions and climate may be overestimated with chemistry–climate models. Given the uncertainty in simulating future ozone, we show that deep learning approaches can provide improved assessment of the impacts of climate and emission changes on future air quality, along with valuable information to guide future model development.

KW - Surface ozone

KW - Numerical modelling

KW - bias correction

KW - Machine learning

KW - Neural network

KW - Climate change

KW - Air quality

U2 - 10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022

DO - 10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 12543

EP - 12557

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

SN - 1680-7316

IS - 18

ER -