Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Corrigendum to “Flesh and bones

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Corrigendum to “Flesh and bones: Working with the grain to improve community management of water” [World Dev. 138 (2020) 105286] (World Development (2021) 138, (S0305750X20304137), (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105286))

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debatepeer-review

Published

Standard

Corrigendum to “Flesh and bones: Working with the grain to improve community management of water” [World Dev. 138 (2020) 105286] (World Development (2021) 138, (S0305750X20304137), (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105286)). / Whaley, Luke; Cleaver, Frances; Mwathunga, Evance.
In: World Development, Vol. 139, 105346, 01.03.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debatepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{42da4bce32614343bfe32b45783cc8d8,
title = "Corrigendum to “Flesh and bones: Working with the grain to improve community management of water” [World Dev. 138 (2020) 105286] (World Development (2021) 138, (S0305750X20304137), (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105286))",
abstract = "The authors regret that the second and third authors have mistakenly been linked with the institutional affiliation listed under {\textquoteleft}a{\textquoteright} when they should only be linked to the institutional affiliations listed under {\textquoteleft}b{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}c{\textquoteright} respectively. Frances Cleaver's email address should be f.cleaver@lancaster.ac.uk. In the final paragraph of Section 1, it should read {\textquoteleft}In Section 3 we discuss our research design, which we argue{\textquoteright} and also {\textquoteleft}methodological{\textquoteright} rather than {\textquoteleft}methodologic{\textquoteright}. In Section 2.1, the first line of paragraph three should read {\textquoteleft}In response, as early as 2006 Baumann proposed{\textquoteright} and in the final paragraph of Section 2.1 it should read {\textquoteleft}More recent iterations of an alternative approach include Grindle's (2004, 2007) concept of {\textquoteleft}good enough governance{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",
author = "Luke Whaley and Frances Cleaver and Evance Mwathunga",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105346",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "0305-750X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Flesh and bones

T2 - Working with the grain to improve community management of water” [World Dev. 138 (2020) 105286] (World Development (2021) 138, (S0305750X20304137), (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105286))

AU - Whaley, Luke

AU - Cleaver, Frances

AU - Mwathunga, Evance

PY - 2021/3/1

Y1 - 2021/3/1

N2 - The authors regret that the second and third authors have mistakenly been linked with the institutional affiliation listed under ‘a’ when they should only be linked to the institutional affiliations listed under ‘b’ and ‘c’ respectively. Frances Cleaver's email address should be f.cleaver@lancaster.ac.uk. In the final paragraph of Section 1, it should read ‘In Section 3 we discuss our research design, which we argue’ and also ‘methodological’ rather than ‘methodologic’. In Section 2.1, the first line of paragraph three should read ‘In response, as early as 2006 Baumann proposed’ and in the final paragraph of Section 2.1 it should read ‘More recent iterations of an alternative approach include Grindle's (2004, 2007) concept of ‘good enough governance’’. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret that the second and third authors have mistakenly been linked with the institutional affiliation listed under ‘a’ when they should only be linked to the institutional affiliations listed under ‘b’ and ‘c’ respectively. Frances Cleaver's email address should be f.cleaver@lancaster.ac.uk. In the final paragraph of Section 1, it should read ‘In Section 3 we discuss our research design, which we argue’ and also ‘methodological’ rather than ‘methodologic’. In Section 2.1, the first line of paragraph three should read ‘In response, as early as 2006 Baumann proposed’ and in the final paragraph of Section 2.1 it should read ‘More recent iterations of an alternative approach include Grindle's (2004, 2007) concept of ‘good enough governance’’. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105346

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105346

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85099517744

VL - 139

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 0305-750X

M1 - 105346

ER -