Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Costs and benefits of erosion control measures ...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. / Posthumus, H.; Deeks, L. K.; Rickson, R. J. et al.
In: Soil Use and Management, Vol. 31, No. Suppl. S1, 10.2015, p. 16-33.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Posthumus, H, Deeks, LK, Rickson, RJ & Quinton, JN 2015, 'Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK', Soil Use and Management, vol. 31, no. Suppl. S1, pp. 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12057

APA

Posthumus, H., Deeks, L. K., Rickson, R. J., & Quinton, J. N. (2015). Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use and Management, 31(Suppl. S1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12057

Vancouver

Posthumus H, Deeks LK, Rickson RJ, Quinton JN. Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use and Management. 2015 Oct;31(Suppl. S1):16-33. Epub 2013 Jun 29. doi: 10.1111/sum.12057

Author

Posthumus, H. ; Deeks, L. K. ; Rickson, R. J. et al. / Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. In: Soil Use and Management. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. Suppl. S1. pp. 16-33.

Bibtex

@article{8f034f2a43154e0da9c60cda6434b800,
title = "Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK",
abstract = "Soil erosion is a key threat to ecosystem services. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures based on an ecosystem services approach. The economic appraisal consists of an assessment (i.e. quantification and valuation) of the on-site and off-site impacts of soil erosion, and its mitigation, on ecosystem services. Many erosion control measures result in negative financial and economic returns. This explains why farmers are generally reluctant to implement erosion control measures without compensation. Based on the assessment described in this study, tramline management, mulching, buffer strips, high-density planting and sediment traps are the most cost-effective erosion control measures for agriculture in the UK. Contour ploughing also appears to be cost-effective, but this measure is not appropriate in all circumstances and therefore cannot be widely promoted. However, actual cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures will differ for local circumstances, and it is therefore advised that individual assessments are made at farm level or field level before recommendations are made to farmers.",
keywords = "Agriculture, environmental impact, soil erosion , soil conservation, soil policy",
author = "H. Posthumus and Deeks, {L. K.} and Rickson, {R. J.} and Quinton, {J. N.}",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/sum.12057",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "16--33",
journal = "Soil Use and Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "Suppl. S1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK

AU - Posthumus, H.

AU - Deeks, L. K.

AU - Rickson, R. J.

AU - Quinton, J. N.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Soil erosion is a key threat to ecosystem services. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures based on an ecosystem services approach. The economic appraisal consists of an assessment (i.e. quantification and valuation) of the on-site and off-site impacts of soil erosion, and its mitigation, on ecosystem services. Many erosion control measures result in negative financial and economic returns. This explains why farmers are generally reluctant to implement erosion control measures without compensation. Based on the assessment described in this study, tramline management, mulching, buffer strips, high-density planting and sediment traps are the most cost-effective erosion control measures for agriculture in the UK. Contour ploughing also appears to be cost-effective, but this measure is not appropriate in all circumstances and therefore cannot be widely promoted. However, actual cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures will differ for local circumstances, and it is therefore advised that individual assessments are made at farm level or field level before recommendations are made to farmers.

AB - Soil erosion is a key threat to ecosystem services. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures based on an ecosystem services approach. The economic appraisal consists of an assessment (i.e. quantification and valuation) of the on-site and off-site impacts of soil erosion, and its mitigation, on ecosystem services. Many erosion control measures result in negative financial and economic returns. This explains why farmers are generally reluctant to implement erosion control measures without compensation. Based on the assessment described in this study, tramline management, mulching, buffer strips, high-density planting and sediment traps are the most cost-effective erosion control measures for agriculture in the UK. Contour ploughing also appears to be cost-effective, but this measure is not appropriate in all circumstances and therefore cannot be widely promoted. However, actual cost-effectiveness of erosion control measures will differ for local circumstances, and it is therefore advised that individual assessments are made at farm level or field level before recommendations are made to farmers.

KW - Agriculture

KW - environmental impact

KW - soil erosion

KW - soil conservation

KW - soil policy

U2 - 10.1111/sum.12057

DO - 10.1111/sum.12057

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 16

EP - 33

JO - Soil Use and Management

JF - Soil Use and Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - Suppl. S1

ER -