Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourse...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media. / McGlashan, Mark; Clarke, Isobelle; Gee, Matt et al.
In: Linguistics Vanguard, 11.03.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

McGlashan, M., Clarke, I., Gee, M., Grieshofer, T., Kehoe, A., & Lawson, R. (2025). COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media. Linguistics Vanguard. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0121

Vancouver

McGlashan M, Clarke I, Gee M, Grieshofer T, Kehoe A, Lawson R. COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media. Linguistics Vanguard. 2025 Mar 11. Epub 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2024-0121

Author

Bibtex

@article{36fc5399924348618fe5c48802236d51,
title = "COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media",
abstract = "Public distrust in government, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professions, and medical science and technology has been consistently linked with vaccine rejection. Policymakers, therefore, want to better understand links between distrust of institutions and vaccine refusal. This paper reports on a case study of posts (tweets) to the social media platform Twitter (now X) collected as part of the TRAC:COVID (Trust and Communication: A Coronavirus Online Visual Dashboard) project. The TRAC:COVID dashboard combines methods from corpus linguistics with various visualization techniques to enable users to explore approximately 84 million posts containing reference to COVID-19 published between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2021 (encompassing the dates of UK coronavirus lockdowns). The dashboard and all sampling considerations (including an overview of the detailed search query used) are available at https://www.traccovid.com. Specifically, the paper analyses a subsample of posts that make reference to vaccines and contain at least one hashtag relating to various categories of dis/misinformation. By employing keyword co-occurrence analysis – a method for examining statistically significant keywords using multiple correspondence analysis – we find that these posts draw on various “discourses of liberty” to protest against perceived infringements on “health freedoms” through the imposition of new norms of behaviour (e.g., mask-wearing).",
author = "Mark McGlashan and Isobelle Clarke and Matt Gee and Tatiana Grieshofer and Andrew Kehoe and Robert Lawson",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1515/lingvan-2024-0121",
language = "English",
journal = "Linguistics Vanguard",
issn = "2199-174X",
publisher = "de Gruyter",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media

AU - McGlashan, Mark

AU - Clarke, Isobelle

AU - Gee, Matt

AU - Grieshofer, Tatiana

AU - Kehoe, Andrew

AU - Lawson, Robert

PY - 2025/3/11

Y1 - 2025/3/11

N2 - Public distrust in government, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professions, and medical science and technology has been consistently linked with vaccine rejection. Policymakers, therefore, want to better understand links between distrust of institutions and vaccine refusal. This paper reports on a case study of posts (tweets) to the social media platform Twitter (now X) collected as part of the TRAC:COVID (Trust and Communication: A Coronavirus Online Visual Dashboard) project. The TRAC:COVID dashboard combines methods from corpus linguistics with various visualization techniques to enable users to explore approximately 84 million posts containing reference to COVID-19 published between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2021 (encompassing the dates of UK coronavirus lockdowns). The dashboard and all sampling considerations (including an overview of the detailed search query used) are available at https://www.traccovid.com. Specifically, the paper analyses a subsample of posts that make reference to vaccines and contain at least one hashtag relating to various categories of dis/misinformation. By employing keyword co-occurrence analysis – a method for examining statistically significant keywords using multiple correspondence analysis – we find that these posts draw on various “discourses of liberty” to protest against perceived infringements on “health freedoms” through the imposition of new norms of behaviour (e.g., mask-wearing).

AB - Public distrust in government, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professions, and medical science and technology has been consistently linked with vaccine rejection. Policymakers, therefore, want to better understand links between distrust of institutions and vaccine refusal. This paper reports on a case study of posts (tweets) to the social media platform Twitter (now X) collected as part of the TRAC:COVID (Trust and Communication: A Coronavirus Online Visual Dashboard) project. The TRAC:COVID dashboard combines methods from corpus linguistics with various visualization techniques to enable users to explore approximately 84 million posts containing reference to COVID-19 published between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2021 (encompassing the dates of UK coronavirus lockdowns). The dashboard and all sampling considerations (including an overview of the detailed search query used) are available at https://www.traccovid.com. Specifically, the paper analyses a subsample of posts that make reference to vaccines and contain at least one hashtag relating to various categories of dis/misinformation. By employing keyword co-occurrence analysis – a method for examining statistically significant keywords using multiple correspondence analysis – we find that these posts draw on various “discourses of liberty” to protest against perceived infringements on “health freedoms” through the imposition of new norms of behaviour (e.g., mask-wearing).

U2 - 10.1515/lingvan-2024-0121

DO - 10.1515/lingvan-2024-0121

M3 - Journal article

JO - Linguistics Vanguard

JF - Linguistics Vanguard

SN - 2199-174X

ER -