Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Crime or culture?

Electronic data

  • Crime_or_culture_chemsex_for_CDS_corrections_version_2_anonymous

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Discourse Studies on 19/04/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17405904.2021.1910052

    Accepted author manuscript, 381 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Crime or culture?: Representations of chemsex in the British press and magazines aimed at GBTQ+ men

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/07/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Critical Discourse Studies
Issue number4
Volume19
Number of pages19
Pages (from-to)435-453
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date12/04/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Chemsex is a phenomenon in which typically gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and/or related communities of men (GBTQ+ men) take psychoactive drugs while having sex, often without a condom. The practice can lead to increased rates of HIV transmission, sexual assault, and in extreme cases murder. GBTQ+ men are already a stigmatised group so those who engage in chemsex face multiple stigmas. This study examines the ways that two types of media report
on chemsex while negotiating these stigmas. We take a large data set of newspaper articles written for the general British public and a smaller data set of magazines aimed at GBTQ+ men to examine how chemsex is represented in the media. We find that the mainstream press focusses on extreme criminal cases involving chemsex, while the media aimed at GBTQ+ men focusses on counselling services and discuss chemsex in relation to gay culture. Chemsex is unlikely to go away, and so we address how information about it is conveyed in different media and call for more research in this area.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Discourse Studies on 19/04/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17405904.2021.1910052