Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedago...

Electronic data

  • F_2018n_Symptomatology_CCC_Jessop_final

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises on 17/11/2018, available online: https://www.routledge.com/The-Pedagogy-of-Economic-Political-and-Social-Crises-Dynamics-Construals/Jessop-Knio/p/book/9781138062504

    Accepted author manuscript, 344 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis. / Jessop, Bob; Knio, Karim.
The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises: Dynamics, Construals and Lessons. ed. / Bob Jessop; Karim Knio. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 265-283.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Jessop, B & Knio, K 2018, Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis. in B Jessop & K Knio (eds), The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises: Dynamics, Construals and Lessons. Routledge, London, pp. 265-283. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161587

APA

Jessop, B., & Knio, K. (2018). Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis. In B. Jessop, & K. Knio (Eds.), The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises: Dynamics, Construals and Lessons (pp. 265-283). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161587

Vancouver

Jessop B, Knio K. Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis. In Jessop B, Knio K, editors, The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises: Dynamics, Construals and Lessons. London: Routledge. 2018. p. 265-283 doi: 10.4324/9781315161587

Author

Jessop, Bob ; Knio, Karim. / Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis. The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises: Dynamics, Construals and Lessons. editor / Bob Jessop ; Karim Knio. London : Routledge, 2018. pp. 265-283

Bibtex

@inbook{d89d2781ecd84c1c939cf44ea8a4ea1e,
title = "Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis",
abstract = "The concluding chapter reviews our arguments in Part One in the light of the other contributions to this volume. The general significance of these contributions was explored in Chapter 1 and, rather than repeat that exercise, we focus here on specific lessons. Likewise, we will not return to the important question posed by Jane Roitman regarding whether it is scientifically and practically appropriate to treat the modern period in general as crisis prone and/or to assume that specific events and processes can best be defined as (symptoms of) crisis to the neglect of alternative ways of interpreting them. For we are not interested in highlighting crisis as a description or self-description of modern times as if this captures the Zeitgeist (spirit of the times) nor do we consider crisis can be the taken-for-granted form of Zeitdiagnostik, an approach that privileges crisis as an explanandum and/or explanans for historical and contemporary analyses of the modern period. Similarly, we do not consider the conditions of possibility of a general theory of crisis. For, while accepting that there are real crisis tendencies and actual crises, we are not interested in developing a general theory of crises or identifying the features of crisis in general. Indeed, there is no crisis in general or general crisis: only particular crises in and/or of particular sets of social relations and the totality of crises in a given conjuncture.2 Thus, any serious approach to crises must define the specific mix of crisis tendencies that create the abstract conditions of possibility for a given type of crisis and the specific features that define the specificity of a particular crisis, whether considered as an event and/or as a process. This is illustrated by the diversity of the case studies in this volume.",
keywords = "crisis, symptomatology, pedagogy of crisis",
author = "Bob Jessop and Karim Knio",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises on 17/11/2018, available online: https://www.routledge.com/The-Pedagogy-of-Economic-Political-and-Social-Crises-Dynamics-Construals/Jessop-Knio/p/book/9781138062504",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "7",
doi = "10.4324/9781315161587",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138062504",
pages = "265--283",
editor = "Bob Jessop and Karim Knio",
booktitle = "The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Critical realism, symptomatology and the pedagogy of crisis

AU - Jessop, Bob

AU - Knio, Karim

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises on 17/11/2018, available online: https://www.routledge.com/The-Pedagogy-of-Economic-Political-and-Social-Crises-Dynamics-Construals/Jessop-Knio/p/book/9781138062504

PY - 2018/11/7

Y1 - 2018/11/7

N2 - The concluding chapter reviews our arguments in Part One in the light of the other contributions to this volume. The general significance of these contributions was explored in Chapter 1 and, rather than repeat that exercise, we focus here on specific lessons. Likewise, we will not return to the important question posed by Jane Roitman regarding whether it is scientifically and practically appropriate to treat the modern period in general as crisis prone and/or to assume that specific events and processes can best be defined as (symptoms of) crisis to the neglect of alternative ways of interpreting them. For we are not interested in highlighting crisis as a description or self-description of modern times as if this captures the Zeitgeist (spirit of the times) nor do we consider crisis can be the taken-for-granted form of Zeitdiagnostik, an approach that privileges crisis as an explanandum and/or explanans for historical and contemporary analyses of the modern period. Similarly, we do not consider the conditions of possibility of a general theory of crisis. For, while accepting that there are real crisis tendencies and actual crises, we are not interested in developing a general theory of crises or identifying the features of crisis in general. Indeed, there is no crisis in general or general crisis: only particular crises in and/or of particular sets of social relations and the totality of crises in a given conjuncture.2 Thus, any serious approach to crises must define the specific mix of crisis tendencies that create the abstract conditions of possibility for a given type of crisis and the specific features that define the specificity of a particular crisis, whether considered as an event and/or as a process. This is illustrated by the diversity of the case studies in this volume.

AB - The concluding chapter reviews our arguments in Part One in the light of the other contributions to this volume. The general significance of these contributions was explored in Chapter 1 and, rather than repeat that exercise, we focus here on specific lessons. Likewise, we will not return to the important question posed by Jane Roitman regarding whether it is scientifically and practically appropriate to treat the modern period in general as crisis prone and/or to assume that specific events and processes can best be defined as (symptoms of) crisis to the neglect of alternative ways of interpreting them. For we are not interested in highlighting crisis as a description or self-description of modern times as if this captures the Zeitgeist (spirit of the times) nor do we consider crisis can be the taken-for-granted form of Zeitdiagnostik, an approach that privileges crisis as an explanandum and/or explanans for historical and contemporary analyses of the modern period. Similarly, we do not consider the conditions of possibility of a general theory of crisis. For, while accepting that there are real crisis tendencies and actual crises, we are not interested in developing a general theory of crises or identifying the features of crisis in general. Indeed, there is no crisis in general or general crisis: only particular crises in and/or of particular sets of social relations and the totality of crises in a given conjuncture.2 Thus, any serious approach to crises must define the specific mix of crisis tendencies that create the abstract conditions of possibility for a given type of crisis and the specific features that define the specificity of a particular crisis, whether considered as an event and/or as a process. This is illustrated by the diversity of the case studies in this volume.

KW - crisis

KW - symptomatology

KW - pedagogy of crisis

U2 - 10.4324/9781315161587

DO - 10.4324/9781315161587

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85059149429

SN - 9781138062504

SP - 265

EP - 283

BT - The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises

A2 - Jessop, Bob

A2 - Knio, Karim

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -