Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cross-sensory correspondences in language

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Correspondences and Symbolism

    Rights statement: ©American Psychological Association 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000583

    Accepted author manuscript, 229 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Cross-sensory correspondences in language : Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects. / Walker, Peter; Regina Parameswaran, Caroline.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2019, p. 246-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Walker, P & Regina Parameswaran, C 2019, 'Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000583

APA

Walker, P., & Regina Parameswaran, C. (2019). Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(2), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000583

Vancouver

Walker P, Regina Parameswaran C. Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2019;45(2):246-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000583

Author

Walker, Peter ; Regina Parameswaran, Caroline. / Cross-sensory correspondences in language : Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 246-252.

Bibtex

@article{8605e680559340e599379828b6f414e7,
title = "Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects",
abstract = "In sound symbolism, a word's sound induces expectations about the nature of a salient aspect of the word's referent. Walker (2016a) proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can be the source of these expectations and the present study assessed three implications flowing from this proposal. First, sound symbolism will embrace a wide range of referent features, including heaviness. Second, any feature of a word's sound able to symbolise one aspect of the word's referent will also be able to symbolise corresponding aspects of the referent (e.g., a sound feature symbolising visual pointiness will also symbolise lightness in weight). Third, sound symbolism will be independent of the sensory modality through which a word's referent is encoded (e.g., whether heaviness is felt or seen). Adults judged which of two contrasting novel words was most appropriate as a name for the heavier or lighter of two otherwise identical hidden novel objects they were holding in their hands. The alternative words contrasted in their vowels and/or consonants, one or both of which were known to symbolise visual pointiness. Though the plosive or continuant nature of the consonants did not influence the judged appropriateness of a word to symbolise the heaviness of its referent, back/open vowels, compared to front/close vowels, were judged to symbolise felt heaviness. The symbolic potential of back/open vowels to represent felt heaviness, predicted on the basis of their symbolism of visual roundedness, supports the proposal that cross-sensory correspondences contribute to sound symbolism.",
keywords = "sound symbolism, cross-sensory correspondences, vowel quality, felt heaviness",
author = "Peter Walker and {Regina Parameswaran}, Caroline",
note = "{\textcopyright}American Psychological Association 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000583",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000583",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "246--252",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-sensory correspondences in language

T2 - Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects

AU - Walker, Peter

AU - Regina Parameswaran, Caroline

N1 - ©American Psychological Association 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000583

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In sound symbolism, a word's sound induces expectations about the nature of a salient aspect of the word's referent. Walker (2016a) proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can be the source of these expectations and the present study assessed three implications flowing from this proposal. First, sound symbolism will embrace a wide range of referent features, including heaviness. Second, any feature of a word's sound able to symbolise one aspect of the word's referent will also be able to symbolise corresponding aspects of the referent (e.g., a sound feature symbolising visual pointiness will also symbolise lightness in weight). Third, sound symbolism will be independent of the sensory modality through which a word's referent is encoded (e.g., whether heaviness is felt or seen). Adults judged which of two contrasting novel words was most appropriate as a name for the heavier or lighter of two otherwise identical hidden novel objects they were holding in their hands. The alternative words contrasted in their vowels and/or consonants, one or both of which were known to symbolise visual pointiness. Though the plosive or continuant nature of the consonants did not influence the judged appropriateness of a word to symbolise the heaviness of its referent, back/open vowels, compared to front/close vowels, were judged to symbolise felt heaviness. The symbolic potential of back/open vowels to represent felt heaviness, predicted on the basis of their symbolism of visual roundedness, supports the proposal that cross-sensory correspondences contribute to sound symbolism.

AB - In sound symbolism, a word's sound induces expectations about the nature of a salient aspect of the word's referent. Walker (2016a) proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can be the source of these expectations and the present study assessed three implications flowing from this proposal. First, sound symbolism will embrace a wide range of referent features, including heaviness. Second, any feature of a word's sound able to symbolise one aspect of the word's referent will also be able to symbolise corresponding aspects of the referent (e.g., a sound feature symbolising visual pointiness will also symbolise lightness in weight). Third, sound symbolism will be independent of the sensory modality through which a word's referent is encoded (e.g., whether heaviness is felt or seen). Adults judged which of two contrasting novel words was most appropriate as a name for the heavier or lighter of two otherwise identical hidden novel objects they were holding in their hands. The alternative words contrasted in their vowels and/or consonants, one or both of which were known to symbolise visual pointiness. Though the plosive or continuant nature of the consonants did not influence the judged appropriateness of a word to symbolise the heaviness of its referent, back/open vowels, compared to front/close vowels, were judged to symbolise felt heaviness. The symbolic potential of back/open vowels to represent felt heaviness, predicted on the basis of their symbolism of visual roundedness, supports the proposal that cross-sensory correspondences contribute to sound symbolism.

KW - sound symbolism

KW - cross-sensory correspondences

KW - vowel quality

KW - felt heaviness

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000583

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000583

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 246

EP - 252

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 2

ER -