Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cumulative prospect theory and gambling

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Cumulative prospect theory and gambling

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Cumulative prospect theory and gambling. / Cain, M; Law, D; Peel, D.
Lancaster University: The Department of Economics, 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Cain, M, Law, D & Peel, D 2005 'Cumulative prospect theory and gambling' Economics Working Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

APA

Cain, M., Law, D., & Peel, D. (2005). Cumulative prospect theory and gambling. (Economics Working Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Cain M, Law D, Peel D. Cumulative prospect theory and gambling. Lancaster University: The Department of Economics. 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Cain, M ; Law, D ; Peel, D. / Cumulative prospect theory and gambling. Lancaster University : The Department of Economics, 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{beb7e19211b14ec08fbaf3b35a0bab39,
title = "Cumulative prospect theory and gambling",
abstract = "Whilst Cumulative Prospect theory (CPT) provides an explanation of gambling on longshots at actuarially unfair odds, it cannot explain why people might bet on more favoured outcomes. This paper shows that this is explicable if the degree of loss aversion experienced by the agent is reduced for small-stake gambles (as a proportion of wealth), and probability distortions are greater over losses than gains. If the utility or value function is assumed to be bounded, the degree of loss aversion assumed by Kahneman and Tversky leads to absurd predictions, reminiscent of those pointed out by Rabin (2000), of refusal to accept infinite gain bets at low probabilities. Boundedness of the value function in CPT implies that the indifference curve between expected-return and win-probability will typically exhibit both an asymptote (implying rejection of an infinite gain bet) and a minimum at low probabilities, as the shape of the value function dominates the probability weighting function. Also the high probability section of the indifference curve will exhibit a maximum. These implications are consistent with outcomes observed in gambling markets.",
keywords = "Cumulative prospect theory, exponential value function, gambling",
author = "M Cain and D Law and D Peel",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Cumulative prospect theory and gambling

AU - Cain, M

AU - Law, D

AU - Peel, D

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Whilst Cumulative Prospect theory (CPT) provides an explanation of gambling on longshots at actuarially unfair odds, it cannot explain why people might bet on more favoured outcomes. This paper shows that this is explicable if the degree of loss aversion experienced by the agent is reduced for small-stake gambles (as a proportion of wealth), and probability distortions are greater over losses than gains. If the utility or value function is assumed to be bounded, the degree of loss aversion assumed by Kahneman and Tversky leads to absurd predictions, reminiscent of those pointed out by Rabin (2000), of refusal to accept infinite gain bets at low probabilities. Boundedness of the value function in CPT implies that the indifference curve between expected-return and win-probability will typically exhibit both an asymptote (implying rejection of an infinite gain bet) and a minimum at low probabilities, as the shape of the value function dominates the probability weighting function. Also the high probability section of the indifference curve will exhibit a maximum. These implications are consistent with outcomes observed in gambling markets.

AB - Whilst Cumulative Prospect theory (CPT) provides an explanation of gambling on longshots at actuarially unfair odds, it cannot explain why people might bet on more favoured outcomes. This paper shows that this is explicable if the degree of loss aversion experienced by the agent is reduced for small-stake gambles (as a proportion of wealth), and probability distortions are greater over losses than gains. If the utility or value function is assumed to be bounded, the degree of loss aversion assumed by Kahneman and Tversky leads to absurd predictions, reminiscent of those pointed out by Rabin (2000), of refusal to accept infinite gain bets at low probabilities. Boundedness of the value function in CPT implies that the indifference curve between expected-return and win-probability will typically exhibit both an asymptote (implying rejection of an infinite gain bet) and a minimum at low probabilities, as the shape of the value function dominates the probability weighting function. Also the high probability section of the indifference curve will exhibit a maximum. These implications are consistent with outcomes observed in gambling markets.

KW - Cumulative prospect theory

KW - exponential value function

KW - gambling

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Cumulative prospect theory and gambling

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster University

ER -