Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 19 (3), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of the Intensive Care Society page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/inc on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 339 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Decision-making in intensive care medicine - a review
AU - James, Fiona R.
AU - Power, Nicola
AU - Laha, Shondipon
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 19 (3), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of the Intensive Care Society page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/inc on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Decision-making by intensivists around accepting patients to intensive care units is a complex area, with often high-stakes, difficult, emotive decisions being made with limited patient information, high uncertainty about outcomes and extreme pressure to make these decisions quickly. This is exacerbated by a lack of clear guidelines to help guide this difficult decision-making process, with the onus largely relying on clinical experience and judgement. In addition to uncertainty compounding decision-making at the individual clinical level, it is further complicated at the multi-speciality level for the senior doctors and surgeons referring to intensive care units. This is a systematic review of the existing literature about this decision-making process and the factors that help guide these decisions on both sides of the intensive care unit admission dilemma. We found many studies exist assessing the patient factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions. Analysing these together suggests that factors consistently found to be correlated with a decision to admit or refuse a patient from intensive care unit are bed availability, severity of illness, initial ward or team referred from, patient choice, do not resuscitate status, age and functional baseline. Less research has been done on the decision-making process itself and the factors that are important to the accepting intensivists; however, similar themes are seen. Even less research exists on referral decision and demonstrates that in addition to the factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions, other wider variables are considered by the referring non-intensivists. No studies are available that investigate the decision-making process in referring non-intensivists or the mismatch of processes and pressure between the two sides of the intensive care unit referral dilemma.
AB - Decision-making by intensivists around accepting patients to intensive care units is a complex area, with often high-stakes, difficult, emotive decisions being made with limited patient information, high uncertainty about outcomes and extreme pressure to make these decisions quickly. This is exacerbated by a lack of clear guidelines to help guide this difficult decision-making process, with the onus largely relying on clinical experience and judgement. In addition to uncertainty compounding decision-making at the individual clinical level, it is further complicated at the multi-speciality level for the senior doctors and surgeons referring to intensive care units. This is a systematic review of the existing literature about this decision-making process and the factors that help guide these decisions on both sides of the intensive care unit admission dilemma. We found many studies exist assessing the patient factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions. Analysing these together suggests that factors consistently found to be correlated with a decision to admit or refuse a patient from intensive care unit are bed availability, severity of illness, initial ward or team referred from, patient choice, do not resuscitate status, age and functional baseline. Less research has been done on the decision-making process itself and the factors that are important to the accepting intensivists; however, similar themes are seen. Even less research exists on referral decision and demonstrates that in addition to the factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions, other wider variables are considered by the referring non-intensivists. No studies are available that investigate the decision-making process in referring non-intensivists or the mismatch of processes and pressure between the two sides of the intensive care unit referral dilemma.
KW - Decision-making
KW - intensive care units
KW - admission
KW - referral
U2 - 10.1177/1751143717746566
DO - 10.1177/1751143717746566
M3 - Journal article
VL - 19
SP - 247
EP - 258
JO - Journal of the Intensive Care Society
JF - Journal of the Intensive Care Society
SN - 1751-1437
IS - 3
ER -