Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Deliberative Democracy and the Climate Crisis

Electronic data


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Deliberative Democracy and the Climate Crisis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Article numbere759
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/03/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Issue number2
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date11/01/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English


No democratic state has yet implemented a climate plan strong enough to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. This has led some to argue that democracy cannot cope with a challenge of this magnitude. In this paper, we argue instead that a more deliberative democratic system can strengthen our ability to respond effectively to the climate crisis. The most visible development in this direction is the recent citizens’ assemblies on climate change in Ireland, France and the UK. We begin our analysis of the promise of deliberative democracy with a recognition of the difficulties that democracies face in tackling climate change, including short-termism; the ways in which scientific and expert evidence are used; the influence of powerful political interests; and the relationship between people and the politicians that represent them. We then introduce the theoretical tradition of deliberative democracy, comparing it to the dominant understanding of democratic politics as competitive elitism and suggesting how it might ameliorate the challenges democracies face in responding to the climate crisis. We evaluate the contribution of deliberative mini-publics, such as citizens’ assemblies and juries, and look beyond these formal processes to examine how deliberation can be embedded in political and social systems. We conclude that deliberation-based reforms to democratic systems, including but not limited to deliberative mini-publics, are a necessary and potentially transformative ingredient in climate action.