Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies on 11/08/2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13530194.2020.1805299
Accepted author manuscript, 1.18 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Departing ‘Secularism’
T2 - boundary appropriation and extension of the Syrian state in the religious domain
AU - Aldoughli, Rahaf Bara'a
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies on 11/08/2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13530194.2020.1805299
PY - 2022/3/31
Y1 - 2022/3/31
N2 - Despite the official secularity of the Syrian state, religion has always been a viable instrument used by the Baˈathist regime to consolidate its authority and legitimacy. Taking different historical trajectories ranging from confrontation to co-optation, the boundaries between state and religion have shifted to conflation in the post-2011 uprising. The official political rhetoric has become explicitly religious and anti-secular, ending an era of official secularity since the 1970s. This newly employed religious rhetoric is evident in the presidential discourse, which is heavily and explicitly infused with religious language. Analysis of Bashar al-Assad’s speech to high-ranking ulama in 2011 and his other public statements on the website of the Ministry of Awqaf provides evidence not only of how such religious language marks the move from secularity, which was used to strategically co-opt religious institutions up to 2010, but also how the deployment of religion has become a source of security, legitimacy and survival for the Baˈathist regime since 2011.
AB - Despite the official secularity of the Syrian state, religion has always been a viable instrument used by the Baˈathist regime to consolidate its authority and legitimacy. Taking different historical trajectories ranging from confrontation to co-optation, the boundaries between state and religion have shifted to conflation in the post-2011 uprising. The official political rhetoric has become explicitly religious and anti-secular, ending an era of official secularity since the 1970s. This newly employed religious rhetoric is evident in the presidential discourse, which is heavily and explicitly infused with religious language. Analysis of Bashar al-Assad’s speech to high-ranking ulama in 2011 and his other public statements on the website of the Ministry of Awqaf provides evidence not only of how such religious language marks the move from secularity, which was used to strategically co-opt religious institutions up to 2010, but also how the deployment of religion has become a source of security, legitimacy and survival for the Baˈathist regime since 2011.
U2 - 10.1080/13530194.2020.1805299
DO - 10.1080/13530194.2020.1805299
M3 - Journal article
VL - 49
SP - 360
EP - 385
JO - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
JF - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
SN - 1353-0194
IS - 2
ER -