Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval. / Msetfi, Rachel M.; Murphy, Robin A.; Simpson, Jane et al.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 1, 06.06.2005, p. 10-22.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Msetfi RM, Murphy RA, Simpson J, Kornbrot KDE. Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2005 Jun 6;134(1):10-22. Epub 2005 Feb. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10

Author

Msetfi, Rachel M. ; Murphy, Robin A. ; Simpson, Jane et al. / Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments : The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2005 ; Vol. 134, No. 1. pp. 10-22.

Bibtex

@article{44a72432e06442e781bdc695a31c557c,
title = "Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval",
abstract = "The perception of the effectiveness of instrumental actions is influenced by depressed mood. Depressive realism (DR) is the claim that depressed people are particularly accurate in evaluating instrumentality. In two experiments, the authors tested the DR hypothesis using an action-outcome contingency judgment task. DR effects were a function of intertrial interval length and outcome density, suggesting that depressed mood is accompanied by reduced contextual processing rather than increased judgment accuracy. The DR effect was observed only when participants were exposed to extended periods in which no actions or outcomes occurred. This implies that DR may result from an impairment in contextual processing rather than accurate but negative expectations. Therefore, DR is consistent with a cognitive distortion view of depression.",
author = "Msetfi, {Rachel M.} and Murphy, {Robin A.} and Jane Simpson and Kornbrot, {Kornbrot, Diana E.}",
year = "2005",
month = jun,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "10--22",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments

T2 - The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval

AU - Msetfi, Rachel M.

AU - Murphy, Robin A.

AU - Simpson, Jane

AU - Kornbrot, Kornbrot, Diana E.

PY - 2005/6/6

Y1 - 2005/6/6

N2 - The perception of the effectiveness of instrumental actions is influenced by depressed mood. Depressive realism (DR) is the claim that depressed people are particularly accurate in evaluating instrumentality. In two experiments, the authors tested the DR hypothesis using an action-outcome contingency judgment task. DR effects were a function of intertrial interval length and outcome density, suggesting that depressed mood is accompanied by reduced contextual processing rather than increased judgment accuracy. The DR effect was observed only when participants were exposed to extended periods in which no actions or outcomes occurred. This implies that DR may result from an impairment in contextual processing rather than accurate but negative expectations. Therefore, DR is consistent with a cognitive distortion view of depression.

AB - The perception of the effectiveness of instrumental actions is influenced by depressed mood. Depressive realism (DR) is the claim that depressed people are particularly accurate in evaluating instrumentality. In two experiments, the authors tested the DR hypothesis using an action-outcome contingency judgment task. DR effects were a function of intertrial interval length and outcome density, suggesting that depressed mood is accompanied by reduced contextual processing rather than increased judgment accuracy. The DR effect was observed only when participants were exposed to extended periods in which no actions or outcomes occurred. This implies that DR may result from an impairment in contextual processing rather than accurate but negative expectations. Therefore, DR is consistent with a cognitive distortion view of depression.

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10

M3 - Journal article

VL - 134

SP - 10

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 1

ER -