Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Developing alternatives to the DSM

Research

Electronic data

  • CooperCantued

    Rights statement: Ethics International Press permit the Accepted Version of a chapter in an Edited Collection to be posted in the author's Institutional Repository, or used in another non-commercial manner (research grant, tenure, etc) . The Accepted Version is the version sent by the Author and accepted by the Editor, after peer review, prior to any typesetting or formatting. The Accepted Version may be posted in or linked to by the author’s Institutional Repository at any time after the chapter is accepted. Access to the Accepted Version should be provided free of charge. Reuse is strictly restricted to non-commercial uses. Republication, translation, or reproduction elsewhere in a book, journal, or other published item, is not permitted without prior agreement by Ethics International Press. The Edited Collection in which the Accepted Version appears or will appear should be appropriately credited. Version update 06/03/23

    Accepted author manuscript, 277 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Developing alternatives to the DSM: The challenge of overcoming ‘lock-in’

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review

Forthcoming
Publication date14/12/2024
Host publicationTheoretical Alternatives to the Psychiatric Model of Mental Disorder Labeling: : Contemporary Frameworks, Taxonomies, and Models
EditorsArnoldo Cantu, Eric Maisel, Chuck Ruby
PublisherEthics International Press
ISBN (print)9781804412763
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is a classification that is currently much used, but not much loved. There have been many attempts to develop alternatives to the DSM, but it has proved very difficult for alternative classifications to achieve uptake. In this chapter I argue that the DSM is now difficult to replace because the classification has become ‘locked-in’. In the same sort of way that it has proved hard for typists to move on from QWERTY keyboards, though this layout is likely suboptimal, it has become hard for mental health systems to move on from the DSM. I finish with some suggestions as to how lock-in might be overcome, focussing particularly on the challenges faced by those who aim to produce an alternative classification that might be employed for clinical and administrative purposes.