Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Developing practice guidance for authenticity i...

Electronic data

  • 2024hardacrephd

    Final published version, 2.87 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning. / Hardacre, Charlotte.
Lancaster University, 2025. 335 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Hardacre, C. (2025). Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2607

Vancouver

Hardacre C. Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning. Lancaster University, 2025. 335 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2607

Author

Hardacre, Charlotte. / Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning. Lancaster University, 2025. 335 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{a67a7a8821714f498811ac38240e6044,
title = "Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning",
abstract = "This thesis contributes practice guidance for Family Learning courses. These courses typically aim to improve children{\textquoteright}s educational attainment, enhance parents{\textquoteright} employability, and encourage parents and children to learn together. However, Family Learning can fall short of broader emancipatory ideals. Funders demands for specific forms of attainment evidence often conflict with parents{\textquoteright} interests or motivations for attending the courses. As a family learning tutor navigating this challenging context, I experienced professional discomfort where practice norms diverged from my values. Specifically, it was difficult to deal with an emphasis on marketisation and datafication.In response, at the beginning of this study, I developed a preliminary theory of Authentic Family Learning, comprising Five Key Practices. This theory aimed to address the competing perspectives of funders, school, parents, and practitioners. The remainder of the study examines and reconstructs this theory. After engaging with wider literature, I incorporated the views of participants using The extended case method. Over two years, I conducted four 10-week family learning courses, employing visual maps, semi-structured interviews, and a research diary. The 51 participants, including parents, teachers, and Family Liaison Workers, provided valuable insights on their experiences of family learning.Analysis of the data, later enriched with authenticity and Middle Way philosophy, led to the reconstruction of the preliminary theory, resulting in a praxis. This praxis, with three characteristics, focuses on the necessary conditions for Authentic Family Learning. The incorporation of Middle Way and authenticity equips practitioners with a framework to navigate the inherent structural contradictions of family learning based in primary schools. The development of the praxis was transformative for the researcher, suggesting others consider the extended case method to enhance practice. The Praxis of Authentic Family Learning provides an example for adopting practices that diverge from prevailing approaches and implementing core values in real-world settings.",
author = "Charlotte Hardacre",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2607",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Developing practice guidance for authenticity in family learning

AU - Hardacre, Charlotte

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This thesis contributes practice guidance for Family Learning courses. These courses typically aim to improve children’s educational attainment, enhance parents’ employability, and encourage parents and children to learn together. However, Family Learning can fall short of broader emancipatory ideals. Funders demands for specific forms of attainment evidence often conflict with parents’ interests or motivations for attending the courses. As a family learning tutor navigating this challenging context, I experienced professional discomfort where practice norms diverged from my values. Specifically, it was difficult to deal with an emphasis on marketisation and datafication.In response, at the beginning of this study, I developed a preliminary theory of Authentic Family Learning, comprising Five Key Practices. This theory aimed to address the competing perspectives of funders, school, parents, and practitioners. The remainder of the study examines and reconstructs this theory. After engaging with wider literature, I incorporated the views of participants using The extended case method. Over two years, I conducted four 10-week family learning courses, employing visual maps, semi-structured interviews, and a research diary. The 51 participants, including parents, teachers, and Family Liaison Workers, provided valuable insights on their experiences of family learning.Analysis of the data, later enriched with authenticity and Middle Way philosophy, led to the reconstruction of the preliminary theory, resulting in a praxis. This praxis, with three characteristics, focuses on the necessary conditions for Authentic Family Learning. The incorporation of Middle Way and authenticity equips practitioners with a framework to navigate the inherent structural contradictions of family learning based in primary schools. The development of the praxis was transformative for the researcher, suggesting others consider the extended case method to enhance practice. The Praxis of Authentic Family Learning provides an example for adopting practices that diverge from prevailing approaches and implementing core values in real-world settings.

AB - This thesis contributes practice guidance for Family Learning courses. These courses typically aim to improve children’s educational attainment, enhance parents’ employability, and encourage parents and children to learn together. However, Family Learning can fall short of broader emancipatory ideals. Funders demands for specific forms of attainment evidence often conflict with parents’ interests or motivations for attending the courses. As a family learning tutor navigating this challenging context, I experienced professional discomfort where practice norms diverged from my values. Specifically, it was difficult to deal with an emphasis on marketisation and datafication.In response, at the beginning of this study, I developed a preliminary theory of Authentic Family Learning, comprising Five Key Practices. This theory aimed to address the competing perspectives of funders, school, parents, and practitioners. The remainder of the study examines and reconstructs this theory. After engaging with wider literature, I incorporated the views of participants using The extended case method. Over two years, I conducted four 10-week family learning courses, employing visual maps, semi-structured interviews, and a research diary. The 51 participants, including parents, teachers, and Family Liaison Workers, provided valuable insights on their experiences of family learning.Analysis of the data, later enriched with authenticity and Middle Way philosophy, led to the reconstruction of the preliminary theory, resulting in a praxis. This praxis, with three characteristics, focuses on the necessary conditions for Authentic Family Learning. The incorporation of Middle Way and authenticity equips practitioners with a framework to navigate the inherent structural contradictions of family learning based in primary schools. The development of the praxis was transformative for the researcher, suggesting others consider the extended case method to enhance practice. The Praxis of Authentic Family Learning provides an example for adopting practices that diverge from prevailing approaches and implementing core values in real-world settings.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2607

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2607

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -