Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing the market, developing the fishery?
T2 - Post-harvest associations in the making of the fish market in Ghana
AU - Standen, S.
PY - 2025/2/28
Y1 - 2025/2/28
N2 - Market-led development initiatives are increasingly proposed in development and governance discourse as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. Market-led initiatives are understood as incentivising, but not explicitly directing behaviour change in small-scale fisheries, through the promise of access to higher value-added markets. This paper explores how the creation of fish quality and hygiene standards in the Ghanaian post-harvest fisheries sector is proposed as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. It does so through focusing on the role of Ghanaian post-harvest associations and their relationship to the governance of fish quality and hygiene standards. Ghanaian post-harvest associations are key to the implementation and governance of market-led value addition policies. Drawing from empirical data, as well as critical marketization literature, it argues that the emphasis by development agencies on selling fish to higher value-added, elite markets, can risk furthering inequality, as well as compromising the nutritional importance of low-cost and accessible small pelagic fish for lower-income Ghanaian fish consumers. The focus on value addition in the Ghanaian post-harvest sector, which is portrayed as a livelihood strategy to mitigate revenue loss due to low levels of artisanal fish landings, needs to be questioned. Policies and initiatives which promote value-addition deserve more critical scrutiny in the development of fisheries governance policy in Ghana.
AB - Market-led development initiatives are increasingly proposed in development and governance discourse as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. Market-led initiatives are understood as incentivising, but not explicitly directing behaviour change in small-scale fisheries, through the promise of access to higher value-added markets. This paper explores how the creation of fish quality and hygiene standards in the Ghanaian post-harvest fisheries sector is proposed as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. It does so through focusing on the role of Ghanaian post-harvest associations and their relationship to the governance of fish quality and hygiene standards. Ghanaian post-harvest associations are key to the implementation and governance of market-led value addition policies. Drawing from empirical data, as well as critical marketization literature, it argues that the emphasis by development agencies on selling fish to higher value-added, elite markets, can risk furthering inequality, as well as compromising the nutritional importance of low-cost and accessible small pelagic fish for lower-income Ghanaian fish consumers. The focus on value addition in the Ghanaian post-harvest sector, which is portrayed as a livelihood strategy to mitigate revenue loss due to low levels of artisanal fish landings, needs to be questioned. Policies and initiatives which promote value-addition deserve more critical scrutiny in the development of fisheries governance policy in Ghana.
KW - Fish
KW - Ghana
KW - Hygiene
KW - Markets
KW - Post-harvest associations
KW - Value addition
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106536
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106536
M3 - Journal article
VL - 172
JO - Marine Policy
JF - Marine Policy
SN - 0308-597X
M1 - 106536
ER -