Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Development cultures and urban regeneration

Keywords

View graph of relations

Development cultures and urban regeneration

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Development cultures and urban regeneration. / Guy, Simon; Henneberry, John; Rowley, Steven.
In: Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 7, 06.2002, p. 1181-1196.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Guy, S, Henneberry, J & Rowley, S 2002, 'Development cultures and urban regeneration', Urban Studies, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220135554

APA

Guy, S., Henneberry, J., & Rowley, S. (2002). Development cultures and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 39(7), 1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220135554

Vancouver

Guy S, Henneberry J, Rowley S. Development cultures and urban regeneration. Urban Studies. 2002 Jun;39(7):1181-1196. doi: 10.1080/00420980220135554

Author

Guy, Simon ; Henneberry, John ; Rowley, Steven. / Development cultures and urban regeneration. In: Urban Studies. 2002 ; Vol. 39, No. 7. pp. 1181-1196.

Bibtex

@article{b7be573c36f24e9697194587059b1c5d,
title = "Development cultures and urban regeneration",
abstract = "The importance of levering private finance and investment into urban regeneration is a central consideration of policy. Attention has focused on institutional investors' motives for holding regeneration investments and on how they might be encouraged to put more money into inner-city areas. The paper argues that, while helpful, the impact of such an approach upon urban regeneration will be limited. This is because, by definition, institutional investors are only interested in institutional property and buildings which do not conform to this frame of reference will not be of interest to them. However, other actors see things differently. Independent developers embrace the challenge presented by fringe locations, mixed uses and the local urban culture and aesthetic-and translate these characteristics into development values. Urban policy needs to address the contrasting ways in which the nature, construction and application of investors' strategic rationality intercept with local development conditions. In particular, greater emphasis should be given to encouraging independent, locally based forms of property investment and development.",
keywords = "PROPERTY",
author = "Simon Guy and John Henneberry and Steven Rowley",
year = "2002",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1080/00420980220135554",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1181--1196",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development cultures and urban regeneration

AU - Guy, Simon

AU - Henneberry, John

AU - Rowley, Steven

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - The importance of levering private finance and investment into urban regeneration is a central consideration of policy. Attention has focused on institutional investors' motives for holding regeneration investments and on how they might be encouraged to put more money into inner-city areas. The paper argues that, while helpful, the impact of such an approach upon urban regeneration will be limited. This is because, by definition, institutional investors are only interested in institutional property and buildings which do not conform to this frame of reference will not be of interest to them. However, other actors see things differently. Independent developers embrace the challenge presented by fringe locations, mixed uses and the local urban culture and aesthetic-and translate these characteristics into development values. Urban policy needs to address the contrasting ways in which the nature, construction and application of investors' strategic rationality intercept with local development conditions. In particular, greater emphasis should be given to encouraging independent, locally based forms of property investment and development.

AB - The importance of levering private finance and investment into urban regeneration is a central consideration of policy. Attention has focused on institutional investors' motives for holding regeneration investments and on how they might be encouraged to put more money into inner-city areas. The paper argues that, while helpful, the impact of such an approach upon urban regeneration will be limited. This is because, by definition, institutional investors are only interested in institutional property and buildings which do not conform to this frame of reference will not be of interest to them. However, other actors see things differently. Independent developers embrace the challenge presented by fringe locations, mixed uses and the local urban culture and aesthetic-and translate these characteristics into development values. Urban policy needs to address the contrasting ways in which the nature, construction and application of investors' strategic rationality intercept with local development conditions. In particular, greater emphasis should be given to encouraging independent, locally based forms of property investment and development.

KW - PROPERTY

U2 - 10.1080/00420980220135554

DO - 10.1080/00420980220135554

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 1181

EP - 1196

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 7

ER -