Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution? / Green, Colin; Heywood, John Spencer; Navarro Paniagua, Maria.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2018. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Green, C, Heywood, JS & Navarro Paniagua, M 2018 'Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?' Economics Working Papers Series, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Green, C., Heywood, J. S., & Navarro Paniagua, M. (2018). Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution? (Economics Working Papers Series). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Green C, Heywood JS, Navarro Paniagua M. Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution? Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2018 Apr. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Author

Green, Colin ; Heywood, John Spencer ; Navarro Paniagua, Maria. / Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2018. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{06479a718fc947ce8d4b5d1dc5d00d8a,
title = "Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?",
abstract = "We examine the London congestion charge introduced in 2003 and demonstrate significant reductions in a number of pollutants relative to controls. We even find evidence of reductions per mile driven suggesting amelioration of a congestion externality. Yet, we find a robust countervailing increase in harmful NO2 likely reflecting the disproportionate share of diesel vehicles exempt from the congestion charge. This unintended consequence informs on-going concern about pollution from diesel based vehicles and provides a cautionary note regarding substitution effects implicit in congestion charging schemes.",
keywords = "Pollution, Traffic, Congestion Charging",
author = "Colin Green and Heywood, {John Spencer} and {Navarro Paniagua}, Maria",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Papers Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?

AU - Green, Colin

AU - Heywood, John Spencer

AU - Navarro Paniagua, Maria

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - We examine the London congestion charge introduced in 2003 and demonstrate significant reductions in a number of pollutants relative to controls. We even find evidence of reductions per mile driven suggesting amelioration of a congestion externality. Yet, we find a robust countervailing increase in harmful NO2 likely reflecting the disproportionate share of diesel vehicles exempt from the congestion charge. This unintended consequence informs on-going concern about pollution from diesel based vehicles and provides a cautionary note regarding substitution effects implicit in congestion charging schemes.

AB - We examine the London congestion charge introduced in 2003 and demonstrate significant reductions in a number of pollutants relative to controls. We even find evidence of reductions per mile driven suggesting amelioration of a congestion externality. Yet, we find a robust countervailing increase in harmful NO2 likely reflecting the disproportionate share of diesel vehicles exempt from the congestion charge. This unintended consequence informs on-going concern about pollution from diesel based vehicles and provides a cautionary note regarding substitution effects implicit in congestion charging schemes.

KW - Pollution

KW - Traffic

KW - Congestion Charging

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Papers Series

BT - Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -