Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Differences by Degree: Evidence of the Net Fina...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Differences by Degree: Evidence of the Net Financial Rates of Return to Undergraduate Study for England and Wales

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>2011
<mark>Journal</mark>Economics of Education Review
Issue number6
Volume30
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)1177-1186
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This paper provides estimates of the impact of higher education qualifications on the earnings of graduates in the UK by subject studied. We use data from the recent UK Labour Force Surveys which provide a sufficiently large sample to consider the effects of the subject studied, class of first degree, and postgraduate qualifications. Ordinary Least Squares estimates show high average returns for women that does not differ by subject. For men, we find very large returns for Economics, Management and Law but not for other subjects - we even find small negative returns in Arts, Humanities and other Social Sciences. Quantile Regression estimates suggest negative returns for some subjects at the bottom of the distribution, or even at the median. Degree class has large effects in all subjects suggesting the possibility of large returns to effort. Postgraduate study has large effects, independently of first degree class. A large rise in tuition fees across all subjects has only a modest impact on relative rates of return suggesting that little substitution across subjects would occur. The strong message that comes out of this research is that even a large rise in tuition fees makes little difference to the quality of the investment - those subjects that offer high returns (LEM for men, and all subjects for women) continue to do so. And those subjects that do not (especially OSSAH for men) will continue to offer poor returns. The effect of fee rises is dwarfed by existing cross subject differences in returns