Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Differences in selective processing of nonemoti...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects. / Jones, Steven H.; Gray, Jeffrey A.; Hemsley, David R.
In: Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 7, No. 6, 11.1993, p. 531-544.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Jones, SH, Gray, JA & Hemsley, DR 1993, 'Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects.', Cognition and Emotion, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409204

APA

Jones, S. H., Gray, J. A., & Hemsley, D. R. (1993). Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects. Cognition and Emotion, 7(6), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409204

Vancouver

Jones SH, Gray JA, Hemsley DR. Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects. Cognition and Emotion. 1993 Nov;7(6):531-544. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409204

Author

Jones, Steven H. ; Gray, Jeffrey A. ; Hemsley, David R. / Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects. In: Cognition and Emotion. 1993 ; Vol. 7, No. 6. pp. 531-544.

Bibtex

@article{58ff2d88b3834eec875b74af7c980da7,
title = "Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects.",
abstract = "The performance of agoraphobic and normal subjects is compared across three different types of task (Kamin blocking effect, incidental learning, and choice reaction time) all designed to tap processing of neutral stimuli. Agoraphobics differed from normals on the Kamin blocking task and on one of the two incidental learning measures employed. Choice reaction time performance was the same in both groups. The relevance of these findings for future studies of emotional processing in such subjects is discussed.",
author = "Jones, {Steven H.} and Gray, {Jeffrey A.} and Hemsley, {David R.}",
year = "1993",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1080/02699939308409204",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "531--544",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in selective processing of nonemotional information between agoraphobic and normal subjects.

AU - Jones, Steven H.

AU - Gray, Jeffrey A.

AU - Hemsley, David R.

PY - 1993/11

Y1 - 1993/11

N2 - The performance of agoraphobic and normal subjects is compared across three different types of task (Kamin blocking effect, incidental learning, and choice reaction time) all designed to tap processing of neutral stimuli. Agoraphobics differed from normals on the Kamin blocking task and on one of the two incidental learning measures employed. Choice reaction time performance was the same in both groups. The relevance of these findings for future studies of emotional processing in such subjects is discussed.

AB - The performance of agoraphobic and normal subjects is compared across three different types of task (Kamin blocking effect, incidental learning, and choice reaction time) all designed to tap processing of neutral stimuli. Agoraphobics differed from normals on the Kamin blocking task and on one of the two incidental learning measures employed. Choice reaction time performance was the same in both groups. The relevance of these findings for future studies of emotional processing in such subjects is discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/02699939308409204

DO - 10.1080/02699939308409204

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 531

EP - 544

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 6

ER -